User talk:Hmehta0120/sandbox

Name of student reviewer: Savitrie Rampersaud

Date of review 05/07/13

Name of Editor: Hmehta0120

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmehta0120/sandbox#Wiki_Edit

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 05/07/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 05/07/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Length of edit long

Image (needed/appropriate): N/A

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Information is accurate and can be found from the text

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-N/A

Wikiformatting: Bullet points would help

Grammar & composition: Good

Other comments: Good Job

..................... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.145.34 (talk) 01:24, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Name of student reviewer: Aisha Hamid

Date of review 4/24/13

Date of review:04/24/13

Name of Editor: Hmehta0120

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmehta0120/sandbox#Wiki_Edit

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:04/25/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 04/25/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): Length of edit is good.

Image (needed/appropriate): No image needed. If image was added, it would be inappropriate.

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Information is accurate. It is from the Schultz and Schultz textbook, and cited. It fits in well with the wiki article.

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: N/A

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-N/A

Wikiformatting: Formatting is good. Bullet points enhance the text.

Grammar & composition: Grammar and composition is accurate, no errors.

Other comments: Good Job! The information is helpful to the article you plan on posting to.

(Aisha Hamid (talk) 23:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC))

Name of student reviewer: Jasmine R Basnight

Date of review 4/25/13

Date of review:04/24/13

Name of Editor: Hmehta0120

URL of editor’s Userpage: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmehta0120/sandbox#Wiki_Edit

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page:04/25/13

Date review submitted to instructor: 04/25/13

Length of edit (too long/too short): The length of this edit is fine

Image (needed/appropriate): No image needed.

Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): Information is accurate.

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes

Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych)-N/A

Wikiformatting: This was used succsfully

Grammar & composition: Grammar and composition is accurate

Other comments: Good Job!

(MsPsychology (talk) 23:42, 25 April 2013 (UTC))

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

=Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback=

=Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback=

Azahur (talk) 05:00, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback
Pre-Edit Peer Review Feedback

Name of student reviewer: Aisha Hamid

Date of review: 5/9/2013

Name of editor: Hmehta0120

URL of editor’s Userpage:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Hmehta0120/sandbox

Date review posted on editor’s sandbox’s talk page: 5/9/2013

Date review submitted to instructor: 5/09/2013 Length of edit (too long/too short):Edit is lengthy, but is essential for the amount of information you have provided. So I would say overall good. Image (needed/appropriate): Great use of image, to represent and support your information. Review of textbook information (accuracy of info in edit): N/A- Article based

Article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed: Yes the article is empirical, primary & peer-reviewed. Review of article information (accuracy, I/O Psych): Yes the article is does relate to I/O psych and support the information you have provided and supports the article you plan on to edit.

Wikiformatting: Great formatting. The use of paragraph helps understand the material. Also use of bold, italics grabs a reader’s attention. Grammar & composition: Good Other comments: Great edit!

Aisha Hamid (talk) 17:53, 9 May 2013 (UTC)