User talk:Hmmpps

December 2019
Hello, I'm Onel5969. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Wade Robson—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wade Robson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 18:17, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wade Robson, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 18:20, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Wade Robson.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:39, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Wade Robson. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:45, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

It's a fact that Wade has never confirmed what Brandi says. Neither is there any proof of what Brandi says. I have a right to correct it. Hmmpps (talk) 18:49, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

You are putting false, unproven information on Wikipedia. And you keep deleting the facts. Hmmpps (talk) 18:51, 22 December 2019 (UTC)

Wikipedia is failing because of people like you, you've put information according to your own preference without thinking if it's actually the truth or not. Also, you've written the page very poorly, just look at it, it's a joke. It's very unprofessional. Anyone will see this page and laugh at it, it looks like something written out of your diary. Hmmpps (talk) 20:12, 22 December 2019 (UTC)


 * , deleting factually incorrect information is fine (cite WP:PROVEIT and/or WP:BLP in your edit summary). In none of your edits, you have deleted anything. All you did was re-introducing statements to the biography after they had been repeatedly challenged by multiple users. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 00:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

You have no facts. You just copy what Brandi has said without any proof and evidence. Because it suits your preferences. You need to say "according to"... that is honesty. Hmmpps (talk) 15:54, 23 December 2019 (UTC)