User talk:Hmnphl

Welcome to my user talk page!

FR Japan 2024 TOM'S
Hello, H4MCHTR hope you are well. Regarding the teams of TOM'S Formula & PONOS Racing, both teams are run by TOM'S. Also I put them as one as they are basically are same team. But if you want to split as it is, I have no problems with that. Thank you for the understanding. User:Thfeeder (talk), 19 February 2024
 * If you have a source for this, we can handle this like for example the partnership between Juncos and McLaren in the 2023 IndyCar Series.

Hello, H4MCHTR.There's no precise source, but I put this link to consider if it's valid. Thank You. https://www.as-web.jp/sports-car/938777/attachment/asimg_p06_ea64562d31c6f82 https://www.as-web.jp/domestic/736295/attachment/asimg_ak3q2718_1e6135a23fd6c4f

Ligier JS F4 series
is there any chance we can create a page for the ligier JS F4 series which is basically US F4 but with the old car? Or we could add it in to the F4 us page? What do you think? S (talk) 19:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)


 * I'm not that into F4, but from what I've heard the Ligier series has like 20 drivers announced while F4 US has around four? So in my mind there should easily be enough relevant sources to base an article on. It should be its own article, adding it to the F4 US article makes no sense in my mind as the two are totally separated and only on is FIA-sanctioned. Feel free to create the article, maybe ask SandoLorris for his help if you want, I see him around the F4 articles all the time. Cheers, H4MCHTR (talk) 06:20, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay 👍 S (talk) 07:35, 11 April 2024 (UTC)

2024 Super Formula Lights
Hi there, hope you have a good day. I know that you have updated the page's results, and you doing it one section at a time while I do it straight all without realizing you did it first. After I publish it and it redirect as an edit conflict. And I just paste back my work out of habit because in the previous past some editors just update the results from other racing series incomplete, while I already updated the results complete, making it edit conflict. It is annoying when I already update it hard, then have the edit conflict appears because someone disturb it with half assed updates thus every time when there's an edit conflict I just copy paste my work and not bothered to check the updated results. Thus why I did not notice your updated results there. .

In my opinion you should not undo my updates, because I already use my time to update the results, and both of our updates difference just in the format and just ignore it than you undo my work makes it look like you not appreciate my work. If you undo my edits because it is not sourced or you just rearrange I understand that because make it clean and factual. I appreciate your update works, and editing. We all here makes mistakes, and we are here helping out to improve. Hope in the future this small matter shouldn't be happened again, we move on and improving. Thank you for your understanding. Thfeeder (talk) 08:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC)


 * You're complaining that I am not appreciating your edits while calling mine "half-assed updates" - that does not sound like appreciation to me. I made one edit per table, four in total, I'd neither call that incomplete nor half-assed. I reverted your edits because your format did not match the format used in other parts of the article: the table shown which points are awarded for which position used bgcolor="#...", so I wanted to match the rest of the article to that. But do as you please, the matter is not important enough to warrant reverting you again.
 * I also do not want this small matter to disturb our editing work further, so I'll explain myself better the next time I'm reverting anything. Cheers, Hmnphl (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * This is another miscommunication between us. I just want to clarify that no I did not said your previous edits are half assed, it's just the experienced that I had before from someone who edit it not properly thus why I always copy paste my work whenever there is edit conflict without checking it. And yes I should check it again, but that was just out of habit of mine. The ones that you update recently is right and not wrong thus I appreciate your work than other editors. Like I said we all make mistakes, and I just hope we do not have this miscommunication in the future and still helping out. Thfeeder (talk) 08:55, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, I understand - thanks for explaining, all good! :) Hmnphl (talk) 08:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)

My drafts
Hey Hmnphl!

Just wondering if you think that any of my drafts are ready for main space without being removed- drivers with Formula Regional level wins spring to mind e.g. Abkhazava, Macintyre? Enjoy your day Certified Formula Neek (talk) 05:43, 26 June 2024 (UTC)


 * Hey there, thanks for your message.
 * I'm not too familiar with the rules regarding putting articles into main space, I only know of the rule regarding at least two reliable sources talking about the article subject. If you seek further clarification, you might be better off asking some of the other editors in the project, as I don't dabble in driver articles all too much. Cheers! Hmnphl (talk) 16:19, 26 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Ah sorry, I instead sent a message to MSport1005 who seems to know more about the topic. Thanks! Certified Formula Neek (talk) 17:25, 7 July 2024 (UTC)

2025 IndyCar
Hi. We tend not to use AfC for IndyCar season articles as AfC is frequently backlogged and we really don't need to use it when the article will be the same as previous seasons; precedent is to manually move into mainspace at some point between the end of the previous season and January 1 (last year I did it in October). I'd appreciate if you reverted the submission &#8213;  "Ghost of Dan Gurney" (talk)  12:16, 18 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Did not know that, thanks for the heads up! Will revert my submission now :) Hmnphl (talk) 12:42, 18 July 2024 (UTC)