User talk:Hoaeter

October 2018
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Abyssinian people. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:13, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Abyssinian people. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Turtlewong (talk) 02:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Oromo people. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Turtlewong (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Tigre people. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Turtlewong (talk) 02:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Materialscientist (talk) 02:43, 11 October 2018 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
—— SerialNumber  54129  14:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Long-term issues at Habesha peoples. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Unblock and Confession
What do you mean by linkspam? Are you talink about the sources that I cite? Do I cite sources too much, do we all cite sources too much too? Hoaeter (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Probbably the reason for the block were the mass aditions of Habesha Union [ሐበሻ] . “What Do You Mean by Habesha? — A Look at the Habesha Identity (P.s./t: It’s Very Vague, Confusing, & Misunderstood) | @habesha_union.” Academia, 1 Oct. 2018. under Fruther Reading in ~30 articles in October 2020. Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

That was a valid sources and read more section, for these various Wikipedia articles because the topics are all interconnected. Hoaeter (talk) 19:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC)


 * It's a blog post, not a reliable source. At one point, a citation was fabricated to make this blog post appear as though it had appeared in an academic journal. Even aside from that, any unblock request (from any of the affiliated accounts) will also have to address some serious WP:BLP, WP:NPA and WP:OWH infringements made along the way via various sockpuppets. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 11:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)