User talk:Hobbs1981

Speedy deletion of Discipull clothing
A tag has been placed on Discipull clothing requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Clubjuggle T / C  12:42, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

This is a work in progress and I believe the judgement you have placed here will prove unfounded once the article is completed with all references etc.

Hobbs1981 (talk) 12:53, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * In that case, be sure to put an explanation on the article's talk page of why you feel the company meets Wikipedia's notability requirements for corporations and organizations. --Clubjuggle T / C  13:03, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Done, please see Hobbs1981 (talk) 13:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. I've removed the CSD tag "without prejudice" for now in order to give you a good-faith opportunity to improve the article and establish notability. Of course, I can't guarantee that no one else will tag it, so you may wish to work quickly. Speaking for myself,I'll allow time, but I do reserve the right to open a later discussion at articles for deletion if notability remains questionable. Thanks, --Clubjuggle T / C  13:44, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

Ok, many thanks. Would it help if I removed everything and then put it all up at once at a later date?Hobbs1981 (talk) 14:09, 1 August 2008 (UTC)
 * It's fine to keep it up, but you may want to keep a backup copy in case it gets deleted in the meantime and you want to try again. You can also create sub-pages under your user page, like User:Hobbs1981/Sandbox if you want a place to test things. Also, I've removed the "inder construction" tag from the article. Wikipedia articles, by their very definition, are always under construction. --Clubjuggle T / C  15:40, 1 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Discipull clothing
I have nominated Discipull clothing, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Discipull clothing. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --Clubjuggle T/ C 14:54, 5 August 2008 (UTC)