User talk:Hobbsy00

Edit Summary Request
I have noted that you often edit without an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. An edit summary is even more important if you delete any text; otherwise, people may think you're being sneaky or even vandalizing. Also, mentioning one change but not another one can be misleading to someone who finds the other one more important; add "and misc." to cover the other change(s). Thanks! -- Kukini 16:26, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

linkspam
Hi - wikipedia shouldn't be used as a free advertising space for your store. Please respect the rules. Thanks. --RobHutten 20:02, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree, propose you delete all.Fred.e 13:04, 8 October 2006 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on 78 Records, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. RJASE1 Talk  04:03, 1 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of 78 Records
I've nominated 78 Records, an article you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that 78 Records satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/78 Records and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of 78 Records during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.