User talk:Hobsie

3RR
There is a specific exemption to the 3RR rule for obvious vandalism. See WP:3RRNO. As this is blanking of sourced content, and an administrator has already blocked someone for disruptive editing for repeatedly removing it, this is clearly obvious vandalism. Please do not add additional edit warring warnings on my user talk page. ~ RobTalk 10:43, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Hobsie Response
Blanking does not cover this specific case as it is the removal of libellous, unsourced material.

See WP:3RRNO

7. "Removal of libelous, biased, unsourced, or poorly sourced contentious material that violates the policy on biographies of living persons (BLP). What counts as exempt under BLP can be controversial. Consider reporting to the BLP noticeboard instead of relying on this exemption."


 * Except that it contains citations to reliable sources. If you wish to continue discussing, please do so on the article's talk page. ~ RobTalk 10:50, 9 July 2015 (UTC)