User talk:Hockenmaier

November 2007
Your recent edit to The Sacrament of the Last Supper (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II 23:21, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:SacramentofLastSupper.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:The Sacrement of the Last Supper.jpg. The copy called Image:The Sacrement of the Last Supper.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 23:29, 12 November 2007 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:SacramentofLastSupper.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:SacramentofLastSupper.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is a redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sdrtirs (talk) 01:22, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Optical fiber
Re: this edit and this one: I hope you have realized by now that it was correct as originally written. I reverted both edits, because the original units made more sense. I can't imagine why you thought it sensible to convert to milliseconds per 1000 km rather than the simpler and clearer microseconds per km.--Srleffler (talk) 05:59, 17 August 2015 (UTC)