User talk:Hockeyislife341629

May 2017
Hello. Your recent edit to Richard Wharton appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person or organization added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. Meters (talk) 22:32, 5 May 2017 (UTC)

Hey im getting used to wiki and richard wharton is real. search up festival hall

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Richard Wharton. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. It's not a question of whether is real. It's a question of whether he is notable. If he does to have an article he does not belong on this list. There is not evidence he is notable. If you think he is notable then write an article about him and provide reliable references to show his notability. Meters (talk) 22:41, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Okay. Sorry ._. Hes famous