User talk:Hodasmia

July 2010
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jerusalem, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 23:09, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Jerusalem. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Hertz1888 (talk) 02:02, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Existing wording of the lead section of Jerusalem is per editorial consensus on the article's talk page. Current and past discussions can be found at Talk:Jerusalem and in its archives.  You are welcome to discuss your proposed edit, which is against consensus, on the talk page rather than continuing to reintroduce it. Hertz1888 (talk) 03:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)