User talk:Hokkanenolli

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org.

Speedy deletion of Ass in ass
A tag has been placed on Ass in ass, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) 10:47, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ass in ass
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ass in ass, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt/TheFearow (Talk) 10:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Ass in ass
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages such as Ass in ass, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Stanley Accrington (talk) 11:02, 9 August 2008 (UTC)

August 2008
Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. --Stanley Accrington (talk) 19:18, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I've just blocked you in accordance with the above warning. It looks to me (and others) as if your additions of "Ass in ass" to this encyclopedia are pure vandalism; however, if you are attempting to describe a real phenomenon, please leave a message here on your talk page explaining this. This does not mean that Wikipedia will be able to include such an article; for that to happen, we would require reference to reliable sources to back up its existence; we cannot accept articles on newly-invented terms. Nevertheless, I'm willing to lift the block if you can assure me that your past addition of this material was a genuine attempt to add to this encyclopedia. --Rlandmann (talk) 19:52, 9 August 2008 (UTC)


 * An article which states that an "inverted anus" can be cured by fondling is not likely to be a genuine phenomenom. --Stanley Accrington (talk) 19:57, 9 August 2008 (UTC)