User talk:Holachicaguappa

July 2020
Hello, I'm Ferret. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Far Cry 2 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. -- ferret (talk) 01:52, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Far Cry 2. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- ferret (talk) 01:33, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

It is the second installment of the main Far Cry series, preceded by 2004's Far Cry and followed by 2012's Far Cry 3.- Is this correct or this..... It is the second installment of the main Far Cry series, followed by 2004's Far Cry and precededd by 2012's Far Cry 3. Holachicaguappa (talk) 22:54, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Obvious the first, which is why it was reverted. You keep changing it to say Far Cry came third and Far Cry 3 came first, which is obviously wrong. -- ferret (talk) 23:01, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

I guess far cry 2 follows far cry 1 and precedes far cry 3 This is my last reply.If you feel this too is wrong, I won't reply or change anything Holachicaguappa (talk) 12:19, 8 July 2020 (UTC)
 * That correct, but there's no reason to change it, because the article is already correct with the proper verb tenses. -- ferret (talk) 21:11, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Ok Holachicaguappa (talk) 02:40, 9 July 2020 (UTC)