User talk:Holdsgood~enwiki

User:Nufy8 - you're a real piece of work banning me like that. Through the Looking Glass (Lost) being a featured article is an insult. a slap in the face to anyone who's ever been accused of fancruft or of creating an allegedly non-notable article.

check out []. someone adds the tags i did, and someone else removes them. the person who removed them then gets in trouble, suggesting that removing tags is unacceptable. yet when i add tags, they just get removed immediately, without any discussion what-so-ever.

wikipedia and high school jocks have a lot in common. they both seem to get hard-ons by pissing on other peoples work while lauding their own. the article for Flesh and Blood (Star Trek: Voyager) gets deleted because the "jocks" don't like it, yet this episode of Lost? it's not only kept - it's made a front page featured article.

or look at List of Stargate SG-1 episodes. tons of episodes have been deleted. trans-wikied because they're fancruft.

at a time when wikipedia is becoming more and more intolerant to episodes having their own articles, you people go and make an episode a front page featured article?

you are a real piece of work, you know that? and then you go and ban me without warning. are your positions so weak that they can't stand up to a little criticism? are they so weak you have to ban me without even discussing it with me?

you people are idiots and wikipedia's standards are totally hypocritical and unpredictable. the articles that stay don't stay because they're any better then the articles that get deleted - they stay because they're the pet projects of admins like you. well, it's wrong. if you think your own opinions hold so much more weight then anyone else's, how about you just disable registration on wikipedia?

the only thing i can take comfort in is that maybe, in time, Through the Looking Glass (Lost) will be deleted just as Torchic - another front page featured article - was. it's a slap in the face to those who worked on this article, but at least it's consistent - which is more then can be said of wikipedia right now.

Your account will be renamed
Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Holdsgood. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Holdsgood~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours, Keegan Peterzell Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation 00:36, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

Renamed
 This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can |log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: . -- Keegan (WMF) (talk) 13:50, 22 April 2015 (UTC)