User talk:HollyMarkum

Welcome!

Hello, HollyMarkum, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Holland-Mark, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Gobbleswoggler (talk) 20:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Holland-Mark
A tag has been placed on Holland-Mark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Gobbleswoggler (talk) 20:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

Status and Advice
As reviewing administrator, I did not delete the article, because it was possible to remove the promotional content, and there were some 3rd party references to show possible notability. I also removed from the list of clients those which do not have Wikipedia articles, as we normally do. What you need to do now is to move the other refs into their proper positions in the article, and expand them to show the date of publication & the title of the article, as I did for the Business Vox references as an example. If they were published in print, give the ref for that also. I advise you to do this very quickly, before the article gets nominated for deletion by a regular deletion process. I cannot predict whether it will be found notable, but you'll be notified on this p. and be able to make an argument for it. When you do, please be aware that the fact that other agencies have articles here is considered irrelevant--it is necessary that this agency in particular meets our standards.  DGG ( talk ) 15:53, 29 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Holland-Mark for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Holland-Mark is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Holland-Mark until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Editor10293813 (talk) 22:10, 5 February 2020 (UTC)