User talk:Hollystevenson4/sandbox

Mass deletion from Sub-Saharan Africa
Hello. I noticed that you recently deleted a rather massive amount of mostly well-sourced content from the Sub-Saharan Africa page without an explanation (in the edit notes, writing only "Deleted a sentence that was from a deleted article", which does not seem to explain the large deletions). I tried to undo the edit, but could not since apparently the old version contained a "blacklisted link". I am currently (unfortunately piecemeal) trying to restore some of the material that was lost. Was the mass deletion a mistake? Skllagyook (talk) 21:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC) Yes this was an error made by a student in training thinking they were working in their sandbox Ctysick (talk) 20:51, 30 November 2020 (UTC)

Peer Review
I was very confused trying to peer review this article because it kind of cut off and I couldn't find a lot of content that was added, however, after reading the talk page and seeing that a majority was deleted that makes a lot more sense. I was having trouble critiquing your work when there wasn't much there but now I see what happened. For the one part that was still there though, it was well written and I liked it a lot. I hope you can get your content back, best of luck! Maddywhit24 (talk 03:53, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Maddywhit24

Jie(Jay) Yin (talk) 10:37, 4 December 2020 (UTC) jayyin: First of all, the introductory part is very clear and directly brings the reader to the point. Secondly, in terms of structure, you have provided examples from different fields, which are basically enough to convince readers. Third, we can see that you have done a lot of research, but you have expanded your horizons and provided more substantive content, which is a very important point. Finally, the course is legally useful, the content you provide is available and well done.

Peer Review
I noticed that some of your information was deleted from the Sub-Saharan Africa page. It confused me a little but i think i figured it out now after reading the talk page. The work that you did cite was very well written. You used a lot of details to back up your facts which is great. I also noticed that all your points that you were trying to get across were very clear and i could understand them perfectly. So overall you did a great job.

BryantTalbot7 (talk) 22:34, 4 December 2020 (UTC)