User talk:Holmes75/sandbox

Article evaluation
Flowering plant:

A majority of the citations worked, however a few didn't. The article does a good job of not focusing on any one part too much. I gives a nice and detailed background of origin and their historical evolution.

Plant taxonomy:

I particularly like that this article has a box at the bottom full of key plant taxonomy terms with provided links for further detail/definitions. I don't like that the citations are hard to find, as opposed to the other article's clearly listed citation section. This article does a good job of defining the 21st century meaning of plant taxonomy, but it lacks the history of plant taxonomy. This would be a good article to update.

Comparing: The flowering plant article had much more detail and readily supplied information. It explained the classification history, anatomy, and evolution, hitting pretty much every possible perspective to discuss. The plant taxonomy article was much more underdeveloped when compared, it lacked everything except the modern day scientific definition of plant taxonomy.

Article proposal
I would like to update the plant taxonomy article that we we're assigned to read during week 3. I will improve the current definition of plant taxonomy by expanding on important and current uses of it, and will also improve the citations section. I will contribute new content to the historical evolution and practical uses of plant taxonomy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holmes75 (talk • contribs) 00:33, 2 February 2018 (UTC)