User talk:HolyCrabfish

August 2018
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Asgard has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:07, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Asgard was changed by HolyCrabfish (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.975821 on 2018-08-16T01:07:43+00:00.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Widr (talk) 04:52, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Also I felt genuinely bad for ruining the article, so here it is. Please restore Asgard to its former glory.
 * I have removed the article from this page. Your edits to that article have long since been reverted, and there's no reason to have the page, categories and all, duplicated here. Huon (talk) 00:43, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
 * I have revoked talk page access. Another administrator will review the unblock request. Huon (talk) 02:13, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. --UTRSBot (talk) 23:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Splitgate: Arena Warfare (Video Game)
Splitgate: Arena Warfare (known during development under the working title Wormhole Wars ) is a multiplayer first-person shooter video game developed and published by American game studio 1047 Games. It was released on May 24, 2019 for Microsoft Windows, available to download for free on Steam. The game revolves around Halo-inspired sci-fi combat in battle arenas where players can create wormhole portals between two points on the map that have been compared to those of the Portal series, and fire weapons through those portals. The game received mixed reviews from critics, praising its unique gameplay but calling its other aspects generic. The game features a variety of weapons and game modes, mostly inspired by those in Halo, specifically Halo 3. The two game modes inspired mostly by Halo include Oddball, a mode where players fight to control a disco ball, racking up points for the amount of time their team holds the ball, and SWAT, where every player is given a Battle Rifle and headshots cause a one-hit kill. On the 1047 Games website, the developers of Splitgate refer to Halo as the main source of inspiration for the game: "Developed by Halo 3 veterans, Splitgate: Arena Warfare brings back that old school arena FPS feel. No classes. No perks. No filter."

Reception
Splitgate received an aggregate score of 68/100 on Metacritic. Samuel Horti of IGN rated the game 71/100, saying that while the game is an "average arena FPS", the "clever twist" of being able to place portals turns it into a "smart, tactical team-based shooter". However, he criticized the game's "bland" maps and its low player count, which made it difficult to create balanced matches. Alex Santa Maria of Game Revolution rated the game 70/100, calling the gameplay "impressively solid" but saying it needed "a bit more visual flair" and comparing the game's armor designs to "forgotten also-rans like Section 8". Aiman Maulana of the New Straits Times rated the game 7/10, calling the gameplay variety "decent", but saying it needed more content and maps.

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.