User talk:Homeism

Welcome!
Hello, Homeism, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Homeism, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.
 * Article development
 * Standard layout
 * Lead section
 * The perfect article
 * Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Deppty (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)


 * Deppty, Thank you for your note. My post is defining and outlining a new term 'homeism' that has been used in the peer-reviewed research -- I cite and outline this on the page I created called Homeism. I have followed the proper conventions in citing research evidence and creating hyperlinks to the existing research evidence. These sources are legitimate and were fully outlined in the References section. I worked hard to ensure that there were no copyright violations and that the Homeism page was a unique contribution that cited other relevant Wiki pages. Is this insufficient? {help me} Homeism (talk) 13:38, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Homeism


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Homeism requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Deppty (talk) 16:36, 9 May 2022 (UTC)


 * I would like to retrieve the deleted material for future reference and improvement and to contest the speedy deletion. The button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion" is not visible on the Wiki page. Please Homeism (talk) 18:16, 10 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Pinging as the deleting admin - Rich T&#124;C&#124;E-Mail 16:22, 11 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Here's the text of the page at the time of deletion - F ASTILY   20:53, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Pinging Fastily thank you. Did you see my other responses indicating that you deleted my content in error? My post is defining and outlining a new term 'homeism' that has been used in the peer-reviewed research -- I cite and outline this on the page I created called Homeism. I have followed the proper conventions in citing research evidence and creating hyperlinks to the existing research evidence. These sources are legitimate and were fully outlined in the References section. I worked hard to ensure that there were no copyright violations and that the Homeism page was a unique contribution that cited other relevant Wiki pages. This is my research: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14036096.2021.2014558 2605:A601:A9BF:2900:9DE8:C111:8043:27D (talk) 02:26, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Pinging Fastily thank you. Did you see my other responses indicating that you deleted my content in error? My post is defining and outlining a new term 'homeism' that has been used in the peer-reviewed research -- I cite and outline this on the page I created called Homeism. I have followed the proper conventions in citing research evidence and creating hyperlinks to the existing research evidence. These sources are legitimate and were fully outlined in the References section. I worked hard to ensure that there were no copyright violations and that the Homeism page was a unique contribution that cited other relevant Wiki pages. This is my research: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14036096.2021.2014558 Homeism (talk) 02:27, 13 May 2022 (UTC)