User talk:Honey Fernandis

Reference errors on 17 August
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
 * On the Abhinay School of Performing Arts page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=676592783 your edit] caused an unnamed parameter error (help) . ([ Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F676592783%7CAbhinay School of Performing Arts%5D%5D Ask for help])

Copyright violation
Hello. I've removed a link to a youtube clip from Abhinay School of Performing Arts. That clip was rehosted from SBS, but there was no good indication that this was with permission. This is a WP:COPYVIO and should never be linked to through Wikipedia under any circumstances, per WP:ELNEVER. Please be careful of such things in the future. The link did not actually mention Abhinay School anyway, and I will be posting something about the list of plays on the article's talk page in a moment.

Incidentally, if you happen to be associated with the school, please read about having a conflict of interest here: Conflict of interest and Plain and simple conflict of interest guide. Thank you. Grayfell (talk) 04:56, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Honey Fernandis (talk) 06:14, 24 August 2015 (UTC) Hi There, I would like to help simplify the language used for Aishveryaa Nidhi's introduction. Any tips you would like to give me?


 * Hello. Sorry for the delay. I've simplified the article. I was drastic because I think the article should start out on solid ground. Too much promotional detail makes the article hard to read and reflects poorly on Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, and its volunteers. There were many, many details that were poorly supported, or were totally unsupported. Not everything belongs in an article, and reliable, WP:SECONDARY sources are the way to determine what belongs and what doesn't. If you have any specific questions, please let me know and I will keep a closer eye on this talk page. You can also use my talk page if you'd like. Thanks. Grayfell (talk) 03:48, 28 August 2015 (UTC)