User talk:HoneycrispApples

Disambiguation link notification for May 13
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jesús Izcoa Moure Bridge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page CSA. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Your edit to Vincent Motorcycles
I appreciate you are relatively-new to Wikipedia and that you thought you were helping in this change, but do you have any background in classic motorcycles? I placed and  both in (in this change); it was messed with in this change with a condescending edit summary, but the link you added does not target the correct article, or confirm what the mainshaft of a motorcycle engine is; actually - confusingly - there are two mainshafts (a pair, bookends), so a bit of a misnomer, as 'main' implies just one. You can see that mainshafts appears in this ref. I wanted someone - ideally the author of the prose - to clarify it, for the readers. So, to recap., several people were involved but none have provided 'added value'. Thanks for reminding me. --Rocknrollmancer (talk) 23:50, 28 May 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry about that - I was trying to provide a bit of clarification, but I didn't realize I actually made it more confusing. Feel free to revert my change if you want to, and thanks for letting me know. HoneycrispApples (talk) 23:55, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Andreaea nivalis has been accepted
 Andreaea nivalis, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Andreaea_nivalis help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! DanCherek (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2021 (UTC)

Sources for "Angry White Man"
Hello HoneycrispApples,

Could you please teach me about the Wikipedia source format before I edit it? I read the link you posted but did not understand where the sources differed from the link recommendations. The sources are from accredited research institutions and scholarly experts with research methodologies noted and metrics. One that did testing research was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board (FDA). by I have taken care to avoid anecdotal sources or pop-news sources.

Kimmel, Michael (2014) Angry White Men: American Masculinity at the End of an Era. New York: Nation Books, ISBN 1-568-58696-5

Rosin, Hanna (November 24, 2013). "Even Madder Men: 'Angry White Men,' by Michael Kimmel" (review)". The New York Times. New York City.

GORMAN, T. J. Growing up working class. [electronic resource] : hidden injuries and the development of angry white men and women. [s. l.]: PALGRAVE MACMILLAN, 2017. ISBN 9783319588988.

Harper, S. R., & Harris, F. (2010). College men and masculinities: Theory, research, and implications for practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Journal of Critical Scholarship on Journal of Critical Scholarship on Higher Education and Student Higher Education and Student Affairs Affairs Volume 5Issue 2 Article 4 2020 Angry White Men on Campus: Theoretical Perspectives and Angry White Men on Campus: Theoretical Perspectives and Recommended Responses Kyle C. Ashlee In https://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1134&context=jcshesa

http://scua.library.umass.edu/duboisopedia/doku.php?id=about:double_consciousness Du Bois, W. E. B. (1903). The Souls of Black Folk. New York: Dover Publications.

Journal of College Student Development, vol. 55 no. 6, 2014, p. 633-635

Toxic Masculinity and a Crisis of Our Own Making'' (Berkeley, California : Counterpoint. 2019)

https://www.pnas.org/content/118/2/e2020589118 (Talk) Hegemonic masculinity predicts 2016 and 2020 voting and candidate evaluations Theresa K. Vescio Nathaniel E. C. Schermerhorn PNAS January 12, 2021 118 (2) e2020589118; https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2020589118 Edited by Susan T. Fiske, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, and approved November 15, 2020 (received for review October 6, 2020) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:3570:4db0:493a:2ccb:425e:d164 (talk) 05:10, 2 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, I'd be happy to give you some more information on the Wikipedia source format. First, it's worth noting that the edit of yours which I reverted, this one, wasn't reverted because I had a problem with the citation formatting – it was because the section you added in that edit did not cite any references. Usually it's better to have sources already in the content you're going to publish before you do so. Since stuff on Wikipedia needs to be verifiable (see here for more information on that), edits that add new information without sources could get reverted, since there's no way to know if what got added in the edit is actually true. Second, I can see that other editors have reverted some of your other edits, I would suggest you read through the policies and guidelines they have posted on your talk page. Now, as for source formatting (Heads up, I'm still a bit new to Wikipedia so please let me know if I didn't explain something clearly): References should be placed inside two . If you do this you should get: . There is no one way citations should be formatted (see here for more info), but for general citing purposes, using a template like the ones in the "Examples" section of this page should be enough. You could just copy-and-paste those into the editing window and fill out as many fields as you are able to with the source you have. Alternatively, if you use the source editor, there should be a "Cite" button at the top, click that, click on "Templates", click on the relevant template and fill what you can out, then press "Insert". I hope this was helpful, happy editing. (One last thing, signing your posts on Talk pages with four tildes (~) will add a timestamp at the end, which makes it easier for other people to read discussions. More info here.) HoneycrispApples (talk) 06:02, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

GOCE June 2021 newsletter
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors at 12:37, 26 June 2021 (UTC).

September 2021 Guild of Copy Editors newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

December 2021 GOCE Newsletter
Distributed via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:02, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

GOCE April 2022 newsletter
Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)

June GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 14 June 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors' October 2022 newsletter
 Baffle☿gab  03:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter
Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2022 Newsletter error
The GOCE December 2022 newsletter, as sent on 9 December, contains an erroneous start date for our December Blitz. The Blitz will start on 11 December rather than on 17 December, as stated in the newsletter. I'm sorry for the mistake and for disrupting your talk page; thanks for your understanding. Sent by Baffle gab1978 via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:30, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors 2022 Annual Report
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors June 2023 Newsletter
Sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:38, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

Septermber GOCE newsletter
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Guild of Copy Editors December 2023 Newsletter
Message sent by Baffle gab1978 using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:53, 10 December 2023 (UTC)