User talk:Honeywell1640

Welcome!
Hello, Honeywell1640, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Acacia 85, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Thanks. I have just had a back and forth with the several others who said Acacia Lodge is not notable. The whole thing is frustrating. I will not be using Wikipedia again. The whole thing has put me off that a person half way across the world has the authority to say something is not locally important or notable and therefore not good enough for a page. We have been around since 1763 and have had many notable meeting places in buildings on the historic register, and consist of members past and present with distinguished histories. I understand and appreciate that this is being done in good faith, but apparently that works one way. To have good faith in the editing and deletion by people, but not in the creation of the cited content of a page creator.

Proposed deletion of Acacia 85


The article Acacia 85 has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Does not appear to meet WP:GNG based on one independent source, published in 1926. Appears to be a personal essay. Does not appear to meet the standards of notable lodges listed at List of Masonic buildings in the United States (e.g., not on a historic register)."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 49ersBelongInSanFrancisco (talk) 05:42, 2 April 2018 (UTC)