User talk:Honi02

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello Honi02, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your addition to Noida has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Abecedare (talk) 04:05, 2 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Honi02, the text you recently added to the Noida article was again directly copied from the cited source. If you keep making such edits, you are liable to be blocked from editing wikipedia. So please read the above message very carefully and not make this mistake again. You should also review all your previous edits on wikipedia and if they contain content copied directly from, or phrased to closely to, the source, remove the text or rewrite it in your own words. Abecedare (talk) 04:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello Abecedare Do you think news is ever been copyrighted ,can you give reference to citations which you find appears to be copyrighted material .You said that ""Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase."" Which i find vague as when i use my words and phrases for Wikipedia editing ,you guys always say these words doesnt match relevant source ,and now when i use releavant news citation ,you think i am copying copyright materials. According to copyright act News,Journals ,Speeches are never comes under copyright.

your warning to block me if i contribute to Wikipedia makes me feared of contributing ,to my horror i found new editors are being harassed by many Wikipedians.I am feeling to quit Wikipedia because of your acts and comments.

your copyright allegations are baseless as news is never been under copyright .you r allegations Which i found completely malicious in nature because ,this was from relevant news source of times of India which is not a copyright materialHoni02 (talk) 03:02, 8 June 2015 (UTC)


 * Honi, the text of (recent) news and journal articles and speeches is certainly copyrighted, and cannot be reproduced on wikipedia (there are some narrow exceptions listed in the message I posted above). If you have any doubts about this you can get a third opinion, by posting a question at Wikipedia talk:Copyright problems, or  and following the instructions to get help on your talkpage itself. As for the block-warning: as long as you are discussing the issue you can safely ignore that, since no one desires to block editors acting in good faith and making some errors in the process. However please do not resume adding cut-n-pasted content into wikipedia articles, till the discussion has settled.  Abecedare (talk) 17:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)

Hello Abecedare let me tell you Names,News, shortwords,Slogans,short phrases,methods,plots or factual information is not protected in copyright .To get protection of copyright a work must be orignal. And now explain you what comes under copyright works,Copyright is a given by the law to creators of liteary ,dramatic,musical and artsic works and authors in included. I hope you understand my point, I hope you may ask this question at at appropriate forum.?Honi02 (talk) 04:29, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Please brother reply an appropriate answer Honi02 (talk) 11:14, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Abecedare is correct. News reports are copyrighted. Your understanding of copyright law is wrong. --Neil N  talk to me 11:04, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Gajendra Chauhan
Honi02, I am puzzled. Why do you think it is more appropriate to refer to Gajendra Chauhan as an [[Indian]] actor than as an [[India]]n actor? Please follow both links before responding. :-) R'n'B (call me Russ) 21:20, 11 July 2015 (UTC)

Honi02, In your zeal to defend whatever you have edited on the page, you are reverting the new edits indiscriminately undoing, in the process, the corrections to the language too.

Your WP:RFPP and WP:AIV reports
Your reports to these boards are wasting admins' time. Please review or re-review the instructions at the top of these boards, Wikipedia's protection policy, and what is not vandalism. --Neil N  talk to me 11:17, 12 July 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Simplified Manual of Style


 * Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring or sock puppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 09:42, 6 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Saffronization, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, and ideas—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Kautilya3 (talk) 15:21, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

February 2016
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Subodh Markandeya, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Philg88 ♦talk 06:59, 3 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Subodh Markandeya for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Subodh Markandeya is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Subodh Markandeya until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Uncletomwood (talk) 18:43, 5 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Green noida Clean noida slogan.jpg listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Green noida Clean noida slogan.jpg, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:30, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

August 2021
Hello, I'm DaxServer. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. '' Please refrain from adding blogs as reliable sources. Please see WP:SELFPUB. Thank you!'' -- DaxServer (talk) 11:11, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of A.P Singh


A tag has been placed on A.P Singh, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Ovinus (talk) 19:44, 21 August 2022 (UTC)