User talk:Honor The Earth

Hi, please ensure that content added to Wikipedia is verifiable and satisfies Wikipedia's other content policies. You can find more in the links in your welcome message below. Please don't take it personally if material you have added is removed, and feel free to ask any questions you may have about this article or contributing to Wikipedia in general. You should also be aware of the conflict of interest guideline, which outlines occasions when it may be inappropriate to submit or edit Wikipedia content. Happy editing!  Dei zio  talk 16:45, 26 December 2006 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

HTE
One typical indicator of notability is that the subject of an article has appeared as the subject of coverage in reliable sources (think newspaper articles, television documentaries) etc which are independent of the subject, hence self-references to internally produced materials are not an indicator of significance, userful as they may be to highlight information. I recommend you seek out such verifiable coverage, as the article remains in breach of WP:V (policy), WP:ORG (guideline) and possibly other Wikipedia standards. Please don't ignore these messages as failure to bring the article in line with these policies may result in consideration for deletion. Thanks,  Dei zio  talk 18:55, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi, it seems the article is still lacking in external sources and references. A proposal for deletion may be made if no verification of notability is added to the article. Thanks,  Dei zio  talk 14:22, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * No probs. The quick fix is to search google & google news and see if any reliable, reputable published sources have featured HTE as the subject of a story. Add weblinks to the article and worry about the formatting as you go along.  Dei zio  talk 15:05, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Greenpeace are of a stature where people unconnected with the org can research and write about it. As your situation brings the WP:COI guideline into play, you have to be careful to make sure everything is objective. If it's a summary of the mission statement, it will probably look OK. If its heralded as the mission statement, given bullet points and bold formatting it will look like a manifesto which is inappropriate. Use your judgement..

Refs - if you use the following: instead of the superscripting method it will generate inline citations automatically. simply place that code after a quote to be referenced, fill in the URL and title ("Article Title", Author, Publication, Date is a good way to structure the title field) and then simply add this code in a section entitled Notes or References -. The refs appear at the bottom like magic. Don't worry about too many refs, as long as they are to good sources.  Dei zio  talk 14:45, 31 December 2006 (UTC)