User talk:HopalongCasualty/Archive 6

Soliciting Help
Hi Beemer69,

Thanks so much for your recent help editing my nephew Duncan Kelm's page. I admit I am a mere novice on here and very much appreciate the help. I am working on the page as a tribute to my nephew, and hope to have it to a good point by his birthday.

I am doing my best to source the article, and there are plenty of mentions of him throughout different sources, so I thought those would be good. Some of his old teammates, Colin Hawley, Zack Test, etc. have far fewer sources, so I thought I was doing a reasonable job citing. I wanted to get your opinion on how I could go about fixing the article to get it up to the standards required.

Again, thank you for your help and dedication to this community. It is very much appreciated.

Regards,

Rugby Idol (talk) 00:49, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Hi Beemer69, Wondering if you had any advice on how to improve the sources or the article. Thanks! :)   Rugby Idol (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

Mortal Kombat characters
Greetings. I have been seeing your work in most Mortal Kombat characters and they are pretty good (especially Ermac). Do you plan to nominate one of them to GA? I think they could easily become GAs. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 17:30, 16 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Nice. I never really gave a thought to nominating them before, thinking the characters weren't that important, so I thank you very much for the vote of confidence (and because I'm an idiot, just now I'm replying to this). :') sixty nine   • speak up •  01:18, 26 April 2017 (UTC)


 * If you need advices about the article before a nomination, I would recommend you to start a peer review. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 01:27, 26 April 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:ErmacPaxEast2011.png
 Thanks for uploading File:ErmacPaxEast2011.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MK1Ermacsauditscreen.png
 Thanks for uploading File:MK1Ermacsauditscreen.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)

Mai Shiranui
Feel free to rewrite whatever you want. I didn't edit that page. It was a former member who got banned due to problems with his behaviour. Cheers and keep up with the good work.Tintor2 (talk) 01:22, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

By the way, I tried expanding Lars Alexandersson's reception and creation sections. Could you take a look? My prose is not very good. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 23:23, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Wow, you were a busy bee. :') There are a few minor prose issues that I'll gladly tidy up (currently at a location with a horrible signal), but overall it's looking good. I'd started working on that article some time ago but fell off, so I thank you for picking up the slack. sixty nine   • speak up •  17:03, 21 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Well, it's that it's holidays in my country so I was bored. Still, I think I might not be too active next week so feel free to do anything. Regards.Tintor2 (talk) 23:58, 21 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Long time no talk. Lars became a GA after the copyedit it was given and also the many touches Uker gave it. You know Uker, right? I think he said he worked in Subzero's article. Other than that I have not done much except expanding a bit Liu Kang and Jin Kazama's article. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 01:37, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Wow, it has been awhile, hasn't it? Congrats on the Lars GA; sorry I never got around to copyediting it like you'd asked. I didn't get to it right away because I ended up falling into another article revision in my sandbox. Haven't heard Uker's name in some time (thanks for the namedrop on his page!). I'll look through Ermac a couple more times (just dumped a surplus citation) before finally submitting it for GA. Always nice to hear from you, my friend, and take care. :') sixty nine   • speak up •  17:42, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * No problem. Keep up the good work.Tintor2 (talk) 22:04, 28 August 2017 (UTC)


 * By the way, I found this guide of Mortal Kombat X' script which contains all dialogues. Might come handy to use them as references. Hope it's helpful. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 15:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you, m'dear! sixty nine   • speak up •  16:09, 13 September 2017 (UTC)

AerisWeather page
Please update AerisWeather page to 'Praedictix'. The information listed on this page inaccurately reflects AerisWeather and better fits the Praedictix.com. Bclark0622 (talk) 18:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * There is no legitimate reason at this time to alter the article. Your past edits were reverted due to conflict of interest issues and clear lack of viable sources. sixty nine   • speak up •  21:29, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ermac
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Ermac you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 12:01, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Sweet! Thanks very much. sixty nine   • speak up •  12:27, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Hi sixtynine. I'll be working through the article and pointing out all issues I see with it over the next few days. If you didn't know, I have already left some comments at the nomination: see here. Just curious, is this your first GA nomination? Don't worry, I'm only asking as I'm likely to give you more time to address concerns if it is.
 * I currently have a video-game character article nominated for featured status which I am looking for comments on: see here. I'm particularly interested in your opinion as a female editor on the article as another female editor has made accusations that there are ongoing issues of sexism in the article. Maybe it's just because I am a heterosexual male but for the life of me I can't see any. If you've never commented on a featured nomination before, it isn't too daunting. As you can see at the nomination, many editors have left a single line saying they support it whereas other editors have left paragraphs saying why they don't. I'd appreciate your opinion on the article, thought please don't feel obligated to review it just because I'm reviewing your article. I review articles because I enjoy it, not to make people feel like they owe me one. Also if you do oppose the nomination please state this and give as much explanation as to why; don't feel like I'll retaliate by opposing you nomination purely because you opposed mine haha. That being said, just a heads up, when I get to reviewing the sources in Ermac I can already see from a glance that several of them are going to need to be removed on the grounds they fail the standards of WP:RS. For example, iUniverse is a self-publishing company and therefore this source and anything it backs up must be removed as per WP:SPS. Just thought I'd give you a heads up that there may be serious problems with the sources, but I will help you through it as much as I can. Have a nice day. Freikorp (talk) 22:45, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Thank you for thinking of me in regards to the JV discussion. Admittedly, I've never commented GA/FA noms before because I've never been sure if I'm up to snuff in comparison to more experienced VG article editors. In the meantime, I saw your notes on the Ermac review page and will work on tidying up the prose and sourcing. It is indeed my first GA nomination, and what's funny about WP is that what looks good years ago doesn't always carry over to the present. Go figure. :) sixty nine   • speak up •  22:54, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Re looked good years ago: Haha yeah that's completely understandable, I know the feeling. Oh just so you know, don't feel put off about commenting on an FA for the specific reason that there are more experienced VG editors. Several of the reviewers commenting on the nomination actually have zero experience with video-game articles. This is fine though, as ideally you'd want some reviews from people who are not subject matter experts to gauge how well the article reads to a general audience. Anyway as you may have noticed I've now finished reviewing concerns regarding the article's prose (though will probably go over this again once the current issues are addressed) and will probably start reviewing the references tomorrow. :) Freikorp (talk) 01:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pup 'N' Taco, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Route 66 ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Pup_%27N%27_Taco check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Pup_%27N%27_Taco?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Ermac
The article Ermac you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Ermac for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Freikorp -- Freikorp (talk) 13:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Congrats Beemer69. It must have been hard with such a big article. Wonder if you are interested in making more Mortal Kombat GAs. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 14:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Thanks! It was quite a ride. Yeah, I was surprised how much stuff I ended up having to clean out, to the tune of cutting the article in half and dumping nearly eighty sources. In fact, I regularly peeked at Lars Alexandersson for an idea of how a GA character article was formatted. I do look forward to fixing up other MK character articles in the future since I have some idea of what to do now. :) sixty nine   • speak up •  22:18, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

I would recommend using FA Lightning (Final Fantasy) as a model (I used it for other articles too). Despite not being a fighting game character, it managed to stand out pretty well. Good luck with Cage's article.Tintor2 (talk) 03:32, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Wondergirls
After I added significant information regarding Wondergirls in what was more in statement form than in Wikipedia format, I happened to stay on long enough to see it removed. I read you had removed it & looked at your profile to see who would delete it all. The information was true & accurate & there weren't enough facts in the history, which I got from 2 of 3 band members, the 3rd my friend Scott Weiland. I looked at all the things you said you are on here, you even get mad like I do at the problem with a generation confused by simple words... Your & you're much less ur, & there they're their & more that bothers me daily. It mentioned your contributions, your slogan to contribute, & 19404 edit/removals, that's my number. I figure this person I see that I agree with in character by your profile, that since I didn't add to Wondergirls in format, & that you dislike trivia I would not only join, but come & add this discussion. In what way could my "contribution" have been added, if at all, & what elaboration given that was inaccurate be corrected & updated? Certainly as a first hand witness with facts I'd like to learn from someone like you so a potential 2nd attempt would be accepted. Thank you. Mikefoley2015 (talk) 23:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

COI on Lone Sailor
Thanks for helping me understand the content rules. I am a neophyte Wikipedia contributor. I wanted to provide concrete proof that I was the model for the Lone Sailor statue. I possess a copy of the letter that sculptor Stanley Bleifeld sent to the President of the Navy Memorial in 1987 stating that I was the model. I also possess a letter written to me by Bleifeld, in his own hand, thanking me for being the model. I don't know how to link to a .pdf or .jpeg of these letters. Full disclosure, the current Navy Memorial leadership's position is the statue was created using an amalgam of photos of various sailors. That isn't factual and I possess multiple original documents and photographs that I can provide as objective quality evidence. Thanks again, Dan Maloney RealLoneSailor (talk) 19:34, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Skinemax redirect
I later figured out what you meant about "a template". I fixed the vanchor at Cinemax. -- ferret (talk) 14:28, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * No problem. :) sixty nine   • speak up •  15:26, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Sorry
Im sorry I disrupted any ones learning I was just seeing how it worked, I promise I wont make any more thing on the Wiki page unless its necessary. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dudeman795 (talk • contribs) 01:32, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Characters list
Recently, I've been working in the fighting game Naruto Shippuden: Ultimate Ninja Storm 2 but I'm not so sure about the way I made its character list due to the way I left a lot of blank spaces. Could you give it a look if you have time? Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 23:04, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Sorry for the (usual) late reply. You mean List of Naruto characters? I don't see anything wrong with it on the surface. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  22:23, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

Halloween cheer!


Happy Halloween!

Hello Beemer69: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve Wikipedia, and have a happy and enjoyable Halloween!   –  Freikorp (talk) 21:31, 30 October 2017 (UTC) Send Halloween cheer by adding {{subst:Happy Halloween}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

Macrobiotic Diet
Hello Beemer69,

Thank you for your message regarding my updates to the macrobiotic diet. Much of the current page is out of date and inaccurate. I have tried to make very small alterations to bring it up to date and better describe what it is. The parts I changed had no references. I do have a very long term knowledge of macrobiotics. I am the chair of the Macrobiotic Association and founder member of Macrobiotics International. These are both non profit organisations. I understand the issues of self promotion and have made great effort not to use the page for my own benefit. I have left all the criticisms in place. In addition I referenced the books that substantiated the corrections.

I really hope we can work together to make this page better reflect the current practice and interpretation of macrobiotics. Please suggest anything you need from me.

All the very best,

Simon Brown — Preceding unsigned comment added by SimonGBrown (talk • contribs) 13:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Naparima College
Edit conflicted with you on this one. I was about to nuke all of the scholarship mentions when they disappeared on me!. Meters (talk) 19:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Oops! I had just reported Bonnie Blondell for disruptive editing ("Marc Anthony Honore") and was poking around the article afterward when I saw all the scholarship nonsense. I certainly won't stop you if you'd planned on chopping anything else from that section. :) sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  19:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)
 * There is a lot of material in that article that should be trimmed. I'll put it on my list of todo and le tit sit for a few days so the editors working on that article can get their heads around WikiProject Schools/Article guidelines. Meters (talk) 19:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

Antwan "Amadeus" Thompson
Hello,

This individual is a multi platinum producer with music on thr radio and a repertoire of songs with notable artists. Are there any changes needed to improve his Wikipedia page?

Best ENKWMS (talk) 00:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)

Deaths in 2017
Hi. I notice you made an edit introducing a piped link to avoid a redirect. Because of the contentious nature of that particular page, long held consensus says that there should be no piping to avoid either a redirect or a redlink. The only way a redlink can become blue on the page is if the link itself IS a redirect - which "Dik Mik" was, to the article "Hawkwind". I've therefore reverted, and if you have further questions on this, then myself and other regulars are freely available by opening a new section in the Talk page there. Thanks. Ref (chew) (do) 17:38, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
 * Not a problem. Figured I'd take the chance. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  01:56, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
 * That's okay. No-one expects everyone to automatically know the conventions and rools - I've learnt the hard way myself! Cheers. Ref (chew) (do) 06:23, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

Gayle Chong Kwan
Good work! Perhaps you could take a similar look at Beatrice Catanzaro, Hartslane, Seph Lawless; this is a field that  relies on publicity and attracts promotionalism.  DGG ( talk ) 02:23, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I myself nominated Beatrice Catanzaro for deletion awhile back, and just voted to delete the Hartslane article, but voted a weak keep for Seph Lawless. Judging from what I've seen so far, yeah, the art genre on Wikipedia is very promotion-based. Thanks for writing. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  23:41, 1 December 2017 (UTC)

Loner Novel Edits
Hi Beemer, I'm not angry cuz it seems like your intentions are good, but I was wondering why you reverted half of the Wiki page for Teddy Wayne's novel Loner. (Especially cuz you seem more interested in video games than indie novels.)You mentioned removing a "ridiculous amount of promotional material," but this material was actually researched and written by my students at the University of South Florida. We did this as a class to learn how to write on the web. Obviously it was far from perfect but I can assure you were weren't trying to "promote" or "market" anything. Many of the students were looking forward to showing their families what they had done on the web over break and I hope you consider reverting their work back. And if you can clean up the formatting while you're doing so, much appreciated.

Peace,

James Jtmcadams (talk) 05:49, 2 December 2017 (UTC)jtmcadams

Orphaned non-free image File:QuanChiDOTR.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:QuanChiDOTR.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:03, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Re: Happy new year
Sorry, I forgot sending you message. Hope you enjoy 2018 and whatever article you want to improve. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 22:44, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Addams Family (1964 TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Levy ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/The_Addams_Family_%281964_TV_series%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/The_Addams_Family_%281964_TV_series%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 18 January 2018 (UTC)

Add to image
Hi User:Beemer69, would you be able to make a new image for the Paul "Jesus" Monroe infobox? Like the, where the Telltale video game version of the character is included please. If not, do you know any users who you think could? cheers. Theo (contribs) 21:13, 23 January 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 4
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Blossom Rock, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ABC ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Blossom_Rock check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Blossom_Rock?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 4 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of television shows considered the worst, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Fast Company ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_television_shows_considered_the_worst check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_television_shows_considered_the_worst?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of M.A.S.K. toys & characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kinesis ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/List_of_M.A.S.K._toys_%26_characters check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/List_of_M.A.S.K._toys_%26_characters?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 8 April 2018 (UTC)

Precious
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:38, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Hey
You still cool with me doing my own thing with Mai? Btw just look what I found: https://www.snk-corp.co.jp/snk-history/common/img/histthumb_106b.jpg (and yes she actually started male). SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 09:41, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
 * Go for it. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  21:46, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

So what do youn think of the layout like I did with Mai, that is everything (games only) about the game-design/gameplay first as a separate section, instead of being tucked inside "in video games"? Because I'm just doing it everywhere. --SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 14:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I think it's a good idea for characters who have extensive coverage like Mai does, so in her case it's just right. There was hardly anything out there about Ermac's designs until MKX brought a goldmine of information. But for lesser characters, they're fine inside the "in video games" sections just to avoid a bunch of tiny one-or-two-sentence subsections. Cheers. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •

Talk:2018 lower Puna eruption
Hallo Beemer69, because you participated in a similar discussion, you might be interested in this one as well: Talk:2018 lower Puna eruption. Best, --ThT (talk) 06:40, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Just left my vote. Thanks for the notice! sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  13:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)

Madballs!?... Yes, not the music band.
A pleasure Beemer69, I ask you something. You have done a very good job editing the article of "Madballs" in English, the classic balls of our childhood (At least mine). Maybe I would contribute to the community what I know about them but in Spanish language. But there is a problem only qualified users can. You as a moderator could give me a hand in the article https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madballs for all Spanish speakers. Already a great greeting to you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pepsiman1985 (talk • contribs) 23:10, 25 June 2018 (UTC)

Kazuya Mishima
After its copyedit and clean up, I nominated the article Kazuya Mishima to GA. I would appreciate if you reviewed considering you are already experience with big articles. Anyway, cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 17:59, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for thinking of me! *hugs* I've never reviewed an article before, nor have I ever seen the article in question in depth (eek), so this should be interesting. I'll give it a good read-through first, but if your past work is any indication (the Tekken character article whose name escapes me right now), it shouldn't be too difficult. :) sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  14:05, 29 June 2018 (UTC)


 * No problem. The article was too big so it might be challenging to review something like that.Tintor2 (talk) 15:24, 30 July 2018 (UTC)

Space Harrier
Do you plan on bringing Space Harrier to GA? It's in pretty nice shape. I ask because there's been a recent effort to improve Sega game articles, and this is one of those classic Sega arcade games. TarkusAB talk 14:05, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Nice; never really thought about submitting it in the past. I'll go in and polish it up a little first. Cheers! sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  01:00, 4 August 2018 (UTC)

Jill Valentine
Hi. I realise you only participated briefly at this article's last peer review, but I was wondering if you'd be interested in looking at Jill Valentine again and seeing if there's any way I can improve it before I renominate it at FAC? I've been working on the article for several months [on-and-off] at this point, and I'm pretty happy with it now, but I'd appreciate any advice you might have. As you probably remember from the sheer length of that peer review, it was quite ... umm... "protracted", so I understand if you don't wanna involve yourself in this again. Thanks. Homeostasis07 (talk) 00:42, 27 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for writing! Yeah, that thread was pretty intimidating, but I'll give the article a lookover nonetheless. Should I just contact you directly if I notice anything of interest? sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  13:43, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for getting back to me. ;) If you see any problems with the article, feel free to make any alteration you'd like. Or if you feel like discussing, you can just ping me here (I'll be watching this page for the next couple of weeks, so I should see it anyway). Thanks again. You're one of the few people who was involved in this whole JV thing to actually be willing to edit again. Most people have run scared. I appreciate it. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk) 22:27, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

I've got lots of stuff to share about Jill if you want. SNAAAAKE!! (talk) 06:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I thank you for the offer but I'm good, as I'm not really invested in the article subject. The "appearances" section of the article looks great; it has a solid amount of content that doesn't go into excess fancruft and overlinking. I have made some minor tweaks to the reception section. As a whole the article is nicely restrained (if that's the appropriate word), because the temptation is there to go all out with a character of her magnitude; when submitting Ermac for GA status I ended up having to cut the article in half. All that being said, you both have the right to flay me alive for my laziness as I'm f---ing horrible at responding especially when I'm going through my semiannual drop-offs in Wiki editing due to outside interests.  sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  17:30, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your edits, Beemer69. And no worries about only finishing up now. You may have noticed that I'm still discussing with another user on the talk page, so there's still some work to do. BTW, would you be interested at commenting at the next FAC? I don't really know when they will be (I guess whenever the conversation on the talk page wraps up), so it's cool if you don't have the time. ;) Homeostasis07 (talk) 22:56, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * I'll attempt to read the article in its entirety. Between work, the wildfire mess out here and the ongoing process of going to multiple places to donate stuff, it's been a bit of a tumultuous month so far. However, chances are I'll like what I see, given you and Freikorp having worked yourselves to the bone on this. (Plus, any continued correspondence on the subject will be restricted to your and my talk pages, as the article talk pages make me feel like a mouse in a crowded room. :) Cheers! sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  02:17, 15 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Damn Beemer. I hope you don't mind me jumping to conclusions, but I've assumed you're referring to the California wildfires. It's unreal to think that someone I've been talking to on Wikipedia has been affected by those horrible things I've heard about on the news. You definitely have a much more pressing situation to deal with than an FA nomination, so it's completely understandable if you can't comment. I just wanted you to know that I'm thinking of you, and wishing that you and all your family and friends escape the worst of it. Homeostasis07 (talk) 01:23, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * Aw, thank you! *hugs* I personally am okay; where I live (San Fran) is not in any danger of actual fire itself. But the smoke is off the charts and the weather is not cooperating, and as a result we're currently the most polluted city in the world. It's a pain having to wear a mask outdoors but things could be a lot worse. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  01:37, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to hear that. "600+ missing" is unreal. I hope things get better for everyone soon. Homeostasis07 (talk) 01:49, 17 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 16
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roy Clark, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tate Publishing ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Roy_Clark check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Roy_Clark?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Drum
Why did you remove my edits from Hip Hop Pantsula Oreratile1207 (talk) 17:28, 22 November 2018 (UTC)
 * A) Unsourced. B) Not part of a discography unless it's actually released. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  18:51, 22 November 2018 (UTC)

Foundation for the Study of Cycles
Thank you for please leaving our edits regarding the Foundation for the Study of Cycles, Beemer69. I am the Chief Operating Officer of the Foundation and would like for there to be correct information on this page. You can see our official Foundation Leadership page here: https://foundationforthestudyofcycles.org/executive-summary/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesocializers (talk • contribs) 16:37, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Please see Conflict of interest.  sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  16:39, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

How can we maintain accurate info here, @Beemer69? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thesocializers (talk • contribs) 16:43, 24 December 2018 (UTC) Thesocializers (talk) 17:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC) Source is the official Foundation for the Study of Cycles page.


 * Your website is considered a valid primary source. As long as you are using it for uncontroversial updates to facts (names of key personnel, number of employees, etc.) then it should be fine. It is a problem if you were to use it for any interpretation of the material - we requires a reliable secondary source for that interpretation.
 * As Beemer69 noted, please be sure to review Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline and also the paid contribution disclosure policy, if it applies to you. I would advise you not to make any more edits to the article directly, but rather propose changes on the article talk page, where an uninvolved editor can review them. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 17:21, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok thank you very much for guidance, all!! Thesocializers (talk) 17:30, 24 December 2018 (UTC)
 * verbalized the issue much better than I could. Enjoy your stay here on WP. sixty nine   • whaddya want? •  18:16, 24 December 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 27
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Manic Panic, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page New York ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Manic_Panic check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Manic_Panic?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 27 December 2018 (UTC)