User talk:Hopelesswiki

Disambiguation link notification for November 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
 * Canberra-class landing helicopter dock ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Canberra-class_landing_helicopter_dock check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Canberra-class_landing_helicopter_dock?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to The Advertiser
 * University of Liverpool ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/University_of_Liverpool check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/University_of_Liverpool?client=notify fix with Dab solver])
 * added a link pointing to The Telegraph

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:20, 11 November 2019 (UTC)

December 2019
Hello, I'm Serial Number 54129. An edit that you recently made to Beaune Altarpiece seemed to be a test and has been removed. If you want to practice editing, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —— SN  54129  18:48, 28 December 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 30 Rockefeller Plaza, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Daily News ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/30_Rockefeller_Plaza check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/30_Rockefeller_Plaza?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 13:15, 29 December 2019 (UTC)

Changes to white space and valid citation params
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Please stop making pointless changes to white space and changing valid citation param names, as you did at People's Mujahedin of Iran, Islamic Socialism, and The Intercept, merely to suit your preference. These edits of yours are in violation of MOS:VAR and WP:CITEVAR, and have been removed. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 11:30, 4 January 2020 (UTC)
 * I have undone edits of yours to an additional eleven articles from the past day alone, all of which have the same problems as indicated above, in addition to pointless capitalization. I know exactly who you are, and if you don’t stop now, you risk being indefinitely blocked as a WP:SOCK and banned from editing under any IP or userid. Mathglot (talk) 11:54, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020
Your recent editing history at Ruhollah Khomeini shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Mathglot (talk) 12:21, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Disruptive pattern of edits
Since you complained at my talk page, I thought you deserved a fuller explanation of why these edits of yours are not okay. There’s a long list, so to save having to type it all out again, you can find it here: User talk:129.94.8.198. The fact that you edit war to enforce your preference only makes it worse. Feel free to ask questions if there is anything you do not understand. Mathglot (talk) 12:37, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring
Please see. Thanks. --HistoryofIran (talk) 14:31, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Per a report at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 02:45, 5 January 2020 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
czar 23:06, 4 January 2020 (UTC)