User talk:Horcrux

Darron Gibson
Gibson was born in Northern Ireland, but he plays for the Republic of Ireland, hence we refer to him as "Irish". Furthermore, even if he played for Northern Ireland instead, we still would not refer to him as "British", as that is not a nationality in footballing terms. – PeeJay 10:26, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

only part
What you have just done for tasmania and western australia really should be going to by state or territory - not just australia as the distinction gets lost in the larger category.... satusuro 00:06, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

fair enough - I have created what I was considering anyway/ Problem is localities and other places not designated towns and cities are not shoing up... satusuro 00:19, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Payen Pa 22
Thanks for adding this photo to Commons Horcrux92. Now all photos I upload go on Commons. Samf4u (talk) 19:38, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

WP:Naming conventions (music)
Btw, per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC there can only be "one" quote topic for any primary term so in the case of Protection which is a dab page, there is no primary topic, and Protection (album) you could have moved yourself. Cheers. Thanks for spotting it though. In ictu oculi (talk) 15:58, 5 October 2016 (UTC)

January 2017
Hello, I'm Toddst1. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Rigopiano without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Toddst1 (talk) 18:20, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Rigopiano shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Toddst1 (talk) 22:09, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

I noticed that you have posted comments to the page User talk:Driante70 in a language other than English. At the English-language Wikipedia, we try to use English for all comments. Posting all comments in English makes it easier for other editors to join the conversation and help you. If you cannot avoid using another language, then please provide a translation into English, if you can. If you cannot provide a translation, please go to the list of Wikipedias, look in the list for a Wikipedia that is in your language, and edit there instead of here. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 22:19, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Reply
I must've misread a different source. I've reverted my edit. Rusted AutoParts 17:01, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

Social inclusion?
I don't understand your message? What item? --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 22:34, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
 * What message? Could you be clearer? --Horcrux (talk) 08:07, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * How strange...? I got a notification, apparently from you, saying thatThe page Social inclusion was connected to the Wikidata item Q3149923, which contains data relevant to the topic Since neither of us have any idea what it is about, let's assume it is a transient glitch and forget about it. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 12:11, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Ok now I understand :-) It was an automatic message sent from the software to inform you that I added the link en:Social inclusion in the Wikidata item d:Q3149923. --Horcrux (talk) 12:17, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!
Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Polynomial-time reduction into Many-one reduction. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g.,. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted copied template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa (talk) 17:45, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
 * Ops! I was certain I did mention the source page. Thank you for having pointed it out. --Horcrux (talk) 19:10, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

October 2022
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Musée des Arts Décoratifs et du Design, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use your sandbox. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:37, 29 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Ops! I accidentally restored an old version. I just wanted to remove wrong coordinates and retrieve them from Wikidata. Thank you for having checked my edit. --Horcrux (talk) 07:52, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)