User talk:Hordak89

February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. faithless  (speak)  23:22, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Radiohead
The Guardian is a more reliable source than the band's management, as the former is independent of the subject, not to mention that the Guardian article is more recent. If you wish to discuss this further, you can do so on the article's talk page, but please don't reintroduce your change without gaining consensus. Cheers, faithless   (speak)  14:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * LAWL... You're evidently following me around... rather amusing. Hordak89 (talk) 14:44, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Your first edit was less than a month ago; here is an edit I made to the article in August of last year. Here's another. And another. One more. "LAWL" indeed. faithless   (speak)  17:33, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Well done...... still finding time to get laid are you...? Hordak89 (talk) 01:39, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

February 2008 (part2)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. --Michig (talk) 17:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Citation was provided. I also know the band personally. Hordak89 (talk) 13:42, 23 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Sources cited as references are supposed to at least mention the information that they're there to support. www.afroman.com (surprisingly) doesn't mention Cud at all. If you have references for Afroman's MTV brawl and injured anus, or Dolph Lundgren's seven academy awards, please feel free to add that information back into those articles, along with the references. Otherwise, perhaps best to leave the articles as they are. Cheers. --Michig (talk) 08:30, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
 * The Afroman brawl was not added by myself, I mistakenly reverted an edit and soon realised my error. As for Lundgren - I know nothing of it, this is a shared computer. Hordak89 (talk) 12:52, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Drexl.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Drexl.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 05:59, 13 December 2009 (UTC)