User talk:Hordaland/Archives/2010/December

Merge discussion for Medical model of disability
An article that you have been involved in editing, Medical model of disability, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Tcp-ip (talk) 01:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I saw the proposal and understand your thinking. Others have much more invested in those articles than I.  I'll keep an eye on it.  Thanks for the notification.  --Hordaland (talk) 01:50, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Robert L. Sack


A tag has been placed on Robert L. Sack requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 04:30, 28 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't understand this, as I see no such tag on Robert L. Sack. Is it or is it not in danger of speedy deletion?  (I've added a 2nd paragraph now.)  Hordaland (talk) 05:23, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Nomination of Robert L. Sack for deletion
A discussion has begun about whether the article Robert L. Sack, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Robert L. Sack until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. jsfouche &#9789;&#9790; Talk 13:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Thank you
For that. I'm back in the saddle again. Anthony (talk) 08:39, 12 December 2010 (UTC)