User talk:HorrorFanatic

Image tagging for Image:Wrong Turn 2.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Wrong Turn 2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 17:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)

Re:Wrong Turn 2
Sorry, that isn't how this works. You cannot say, "if you want them go to a fansite". This is an encyclopedia, which means "if you want them you need to cite them". Try citations, you might find it useful. Bignole 17:10, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I moved that stuff out of trivia because it belongs in the production section. The Director's intention to have more inbred members is a production information, not trivia. Also, we can't use that plot because it's a plot from IMDb.com, which is directly plagarized (that was why I reworded it). Also, there shouldn't be a ratings section, but a simple ratings infobox to the right of the article. The added bit about it originally being NC-17 and then being edited for "R" would either go into the production (seeing as it's an editing thing) or into a "Release" section. Bignole 16:45, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * I made the changes. We cannot simply say "on his site", or "he said"..we need in-text citations. See featured article Halloween, another horror film that is a featured. Bignole 17:15, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * Please review the expanded plot on IMDb, you will see it is the exact same (it even has the ...Who will survive? ending). Please be aware that I believe that YOU and the "troll" are the same person and have been reported as being so. You completely disregard policy, guidelines and manuel of styles for film articles (even after I have repeatedly told you) and you make the same edits and reversions as the anonymous IP address. An inquiry has been filed and it will soon be determined if you, User:HorrorMoviesFanatic and User:Kenhl, along with the dozen or more anonymous IP addresses are the same person. I do not plan to revert or make any further changes to Wrong Turn 2 until this matter is addressed and closed (which should be no longer than 3 days). Please note that using sock puppets for disruptive purposes, and throwaway accounts can be cause for indefinite banning from editing Wikipedia pages. Bignole 18:32, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
 * No, I'm sorry. The problem lies in that it isn't just two users, it's almost 20 or more address. There are 3 registered users (this account included) and about 16 or so anonymous IP addresses. They all visit the same pages, revert for each other, or just edit each other's previous edits, and usually end just before a new one begins. I've tried to tell you what you need in the article and you ignore me (on this account and if it turns out to be you on all of them, on the others as well). When I warned the IP address you showed up, when I told you the other IP address showed back up. The only thing the check will be able to determine is if all of the accounts are the work of the same person (but it cannot be determined if YOUR sister is the real culprit and you are just a victim of her misdeads). If it's determined that this account is not part of the group of IP addresses than ok, that's fine. But I'm skeptical of that because you seem to be aware of trolls, but not of basic editing guidelines like citations and proper information that is suitable (or not suitable) for Wikipedia. This makes me think you've been around for much longer than 7 days (seeing as your first edit on this user name was January 1, 2007). Bignole 19:07, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Rachael Taylor.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rachael Taylor.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 17:08, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Wrong Turn 2
When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this: The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

Also, your revert returned poor formatting, unsourced material, etc. Are you in fact the same person as MattTyler (talk • contribs) and 89.172.39.1 (talk • contribs), as you're all making precisely the same revert? --Mel Etitis ( Μελ Ετητης ) 22:46, 9 February 2007 (UTC)


 * Ah, I see that the same pattern occurs at Erica Leerhsen, where the revert is even closer to straightforward vandalism, as well as including the sort of unsourced changes found at Wrong Turn 2. If you are indeed all three, you should know that sock-puppetry of this sort is a blockable offence. --Mel Etitis  ( Μελ Ετητης ) 22:50, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

I dont have multiple accounts, I just saw that you are constantly reverting other edits for no reason (e.g. when somebody wrote that WT2 trailer will be released on February 23rd, you deleted it for no reason.). Please just don't delete that trailer info when it's accurate. --HorrorFanatic

You need to look more carefully at what you're reverting, and at the edit summaries. --Mel Etitis ( Talk ) 13:27, 10 February 2007 (UTC)


 * I see that you've just added again the duplicate wikilinking of Rollins (why?), and a badly formatted addition of the reference to the trailer with a fact template. If you don't have a source, don't add it.  If the source in your edit summary is genuine, then add it. --Mel Etitis  ( Talk ) 13:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:ErLeerhsenWarriorClass.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ErLeerhsenWarriorClass.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 13:05, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:LeerhsenWarriorClass.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:LeerhsenWarriorClass.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:06, 10 March 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:ErLeerhsenWarriorClass.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:ErLeerhsenWarriorClass.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:51, 27 October 2007 (UTC)