User talk:Horrorhistorian

Welcome!
Hello, Horrorhistorian, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Edison Records, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see: If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia: I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 18:57, 28 October 2018 (UTC)
 * Policy on neutral point of view
 * Guideline on spam
 * Guideline on external links
 * Guideline on conflict of interest
 * FAQ for Organizations
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and how to develop articles
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * Article wizard for creating new articles
 * Simplified Manual of Style

Why I reverted your edits (besides grammar and comprehensibility)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Fan fiction. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. -- Orange Mike &#124;  Talk  17:56, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

I do research what I add so don't dismiss that. Someone who worked with The Boston Globe's contributor on a publication I fact check. Don't implicated I fabricated sources ala Stephen Glass. Horrorhistorian (talk) 18:15, 29 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2018
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Edison Records, you may be blocked from editing. ''Do not re-add this. It is also promotion. It has nothing to do with the 1929 company. If you re-add this without reliable sources which directly tie your added material to the topic of I will report you to WP:ANI. I would block you myself but I am WP:INVOLVED. PLEASE, please read our policies and try to understand why your additions here violate Wikipedia terms and policies.'' 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 20:16, 29 October 2018 (UTC)  modified  78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 13:30, 30 October 2018 (UTC)

January 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Huon (talk) 20:16, 7 January 2019 (UTC)

.


 * This is ample behavioural evidence of sockpuppetry (that is, abuse of multiple accounts, specifically, creation of a new account to edit while another account is blocked). Furthermore, practically all this account's edits to articles were unsourced, largely incoherent, at times veered into possible violations of the policy on biographies of living persons (!), and to my knowledge they had to be reverted without exception. That's not even considering edits like this. Huon (talk) 21:20, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

--UTRSBot (talk) 22:28, 8 January 2019 (UTC)