User talk:Horseless Headman/Archive 2

I have been mentioning the reason for edits
The reason for the edits done has been duly mentioned for most if not for all the edits, I am not eager to do the edits I am a resident of the place of the topics/regions in discussion. Kindly let me know if I have violated any copy rights while writing the content which I have clearly not done so. Kindly let me know if you are on board with me.

Regards — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.212.53.252 (talk) 19:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC) eeehhh...? Poepkop (talk) 19:25, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Did you mean this as an answer for me? Many of the reasons you have given have been false. Take this conversation to your talk page please. Ceosad (talk) 19:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)

Removed my edit
Why did you revert my edit? Please undo your actions 70.53.240.170 (talk) 17:08, 21 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I have restored my legitimate edit. Be warned that misuse of antivandalism tool can result in your privileges being revoked : Twinkle. 70.53.240.170 (talk) 17:17, 21 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

БЛЯТЬ!!!!
Сходи,сосни отцовский хуй,ебанушка,блять! 213.87.131.235 (talk) 18:44, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * yeah yeah yeah "fuck" this "fuck" that. We'd greatly appreciate it if you would write in English, though. Poepkop (talk) 18:57, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Quick
Noted wont happen again. However it was kinda funny :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.185.220.60 (talk) 19:12, 8 December 2015 (UTC)

Gebruikersnaam
Hallo,

Vriendelijk verzoek om uw gebruikersnaam hier te wijzigen.

Alvast bedankt. 143.176.216.29 (talk) 14:55, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Welcome!


Hello, Poepkop, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to continue. Some useful pages to visit are:
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Tutorial
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
 * The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. We're so glad you're here! 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 15:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)

Username
I have removed the report about your name from WP:UAA. While it may or may not be in violation of the policy I don't think it is a clear enough violation to enforce action at this point. This does not prevent someone from trying to form a consensus of WP:RFCN, if that happens then whatever consensus that is arrived at will probably be followed. Until then I think we can just carry on. HighInBC 22:10, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello and thanks for the information (and the time you spent last night (local Poepkop time) on someone's userpage), yes even I could live with a consensus opinion, strange that involved IP cannot. But, question: what would consensus be if negative, "alter name" or "block", in other words, will I be given time to change my username (I do not know how long that takes, 1 or 2 days?) or is an admin then "just" going to block me without informing me first of the consensus result? Thanks in advance for answering, Poepkop (talk) 13:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

Poepkop, you can be 'shit head', just don't act like one! . Have you ever seen the movie Alien Nation? 220  of  Borg 03:53, 19 December 2015 (UTC) The chief human character in Alien Nation is Sykes. In the language of the aliens his surname can be interpreted to mean, ... one guess. 220  of  Borg 13:37, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi, well, yes, I explained in those texts elsewhere that Dunghead or Foghead is the best translation as that is how we always used it, but one person keeps on insisting on the literal translation, which imho does not confer the meaning of the term. Consensus might be an option, resistance is futile after all. :-) I do not think I saw the movie/series Alien Nation, I might want to check it out at our local dvd rental, sounds nice from the wikipage (or did I miss something now in relation to "shit head" and "Alien Nation" here?). I did see in the media that the latest Star Wars movie seems to be a success, but I am not sure if I may talk to a Borg about Star Wars ;-)? And no I hope I never act(ed) like a "shit head", as you say :-) Poepkop (talk) 13:22, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Sorry for being a bit obscure. (sounds like boofhead might be an Australian English equivalent to 'Poepkop')
 * I see, I missed it indeed lol :-) Thanks. Poepkop (talk) 14:35, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

++++ Reminder for myself before archiving end of year: last version of UAA discussion here, continued discussion IP & admin on IP Usertalkpage and  with last diff , among admins. Poepkop (talk) 11:22, 20 December 2015 (UTC). And for argument's sake, User Poohead exists and unblocked, there are more Pooheads, search in usercreationlog. Poepkop (talk) 19:47, 8 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Hi Poepkop, Browsing through Wikipedia I noticed your username. I have no interest in seeing you or your username removed from Wikipedia, but let me share my thoughts on this situation. I think you're Dutch like I am, but since this is the English Wikipedia I'll keep my message in English. Are you familiar with linguistics and semantics? Sometimes, things can get lost in translation. A chair is "stoel", right? Try to translate "gezellig" to English; there isn't a one-on-one translation of the word. You have to think of social, cultural and linguistic differences. So to me, "poep" isn't offensive or vulgar by itself. Words like "schijt" and "stront" are more offensive and vulgar, while "drol" is more comically, yet they all refer to, well, human feces. It's more factual, "poep". I understand though, that the English word "poop" might have a more negative connotation to some.
 * That being said, the "rude" part in your username is actually "kop", to me a least. In Dutch, we use "hoofd", like "mensenhoofd", "afdelingshoofd" or "hoofdpijn". The word "kop" is more used in a negative way, from "hou je kop" to "wat een lelijke kop". If your headache is really bad, you would say "koppijn". I think this comes from using the word "kop" also as a noun ("zelfstandig naamwoord") like "kop koffie" or "kopstoot", being more of a "thing" and not necessarily part of the human body. So to me, "Poephoofd" would be a more friendly username, but I wouldn't urge you to change it or anything. Kind regards, happy editing en een goede jaarwisseling toegewenst! --Soetermans. T / C 14:48, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Hello @User:Soetermans, thanks for your input on this, erm, issue ;-) I would tend to disagree somewhat with the use of "kop" being necessarily offensive, as I explained earlier and elsewhere, but as another example of what I think is a (imho) not rude compound containing "kop", the word "slaapkop", for someone who slept / sleeps too long, or spends most of his days sleeping. Here, the "softened" compound "slaaphoofd" does not exist (at least in the online Van Dale). Also one can find the word "bloemkop" ("flower head", i.e. the plant) being used to describe the size of a flower on a plant: e.g. "bloemkop = 25 cm". Also, a cat "geeft kopjes", a sweeter expression for his "kop". I understand various people may have various opinions about this, obviously. I have been educated as a chemist / biologist, and probably from there, for me, there is no such negative charge for the word "kop" when applied to a human, (as we are very close to other creatures), with the exception of typical insults like "rotkop", "kankerkop" etc (pardon for mentioning) of course. Another neutral fashion for th euse of "kop" is in anatomy, as in the "kop van een gewricht" (~ head of a joint). Also, I feel a kind of connection with nature that transcends issues like names given to things, though that is likely not the first thing someone Dutch thinks when reading / hearing "Poepkop". (I explained earlier already "poepkop" was used where I grew up and even in my student's days we called ourselves poepkop for doing something not so clever, I live in another country now; also, where I grew up we used "kop" and "hoofd" for animals interchangeably so there was not some clear distinction between the 2, so anyway it is not supposed to be insulting or anything). Yes, "poephoofd" I could have done as well, had it occurred to me at the time I created the account, but probably the pain - as far as WP policy is concerned - is in the "poep"-part, so if I do change it, it is likely something quite different. Actually there are some more notes below, if you scroll down, under section header "hahahah" from some other wikipedians about the name, and/or lingual interpretation issues. Of course, if I change my name, I cannot guarantee someone somewhere in the world might consider it local slang for something (see the facebook example mentioned below, about different interpretations of the same word) ;-). Yes, I wish you a Happy and Fulfilling 2016!

Comment
Mall cop :) Trying to show my students why wikipedia isn't acceptable source to use for the fact that anyone can edit/make claims without any factual evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.114.53.191 (talk) 16:14, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, just make sure your students always take info that is sourced / referenced, whether that is on Wikipedia or not. Poepkop (talk) 16:24, 21 December 2015 (UTC)

Seasons Greetings!

 * It's been almost two years since I welcomed you to Wikipedia, and I see your efforts to keep the encyclopedia clean is still going strong! You may be eligible for rollback at this stage, and I do encourage you to apply! Whether or not you do so is entirely up to you; in any case, I want to wish you a Merry Christmas, and a Happy New Year! — k6ka  🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 18:14, 23 December 2015 (UTC)

Season's Greetings!
To You and Yours! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 17:40, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

remove my ip thank you.
I have sited my work for the edits. Your site is user edited and falsifying published fact. Vandalism or not, this will be the last time I use the main wiki. for your name, looks like an alias. What truths does wiki invest in hiding? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.157.96.99 (talk) 13:06, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Erm, no, I am technically unable to "remove [my] IP thank you", sorry. If you, however, have serious concerns parts of the content of Star Wars canon is / are a copyright violation, as one of your edit summaries suggests, please supply the original book / website where the text in the Article was taken from, and put that info on the Talkpage of the Article, before completely deleting an Article's content. Thank you Poepkop (talk) 15:45, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

hahahah
in some language/pun situations your username makes me laugh when editing for the comedy wikiproject, so hahah into the new year I say!!! I dont have nederlands or afrikaans but it smells that way :) JarrahTree 16:11, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Why are there so many dirty languages in this world? :-) Or should I say dirty minds ;-) ? I smell like eucalyptus. No, really! Poepkop (talk) 16:17, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * apology if I offend, have been listening in background/side glimpsing/watching 2 parts of http://www.abc.net.au/tv/programs/stop-laughing-this-is-serious/ while I have been editing tonight, and it sort of drips over into contributions list i have been doing... Indian immigrants s wonder why common surnames like dipshit, in Australia are usually changed, quickly when they get here... JarrahTree 16:25, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Oh no you did not offend, it was funny :-) "Dipshit" is an Indian surname? lol. Would they get away with a WP User account by their own name? Keep up the fun. And the good work, of course :-) Poepkop (talk) 18:12, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * 7&amp;6=thirteen (☎) 19:32, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanx for the link, and OMG :-). I fear he will have to change his name to (e.g.) Black Rooster Inn? If it is good for business he has little choice if FB does not change their opinion :-( Tower of Babel-like, people are misunderstanding each other. There are so many languages and dialects in the world, any random string of letters could mean something silly in some language. :-) Poepkop (talk) 20:02, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * , 7&6=thirteen, As another example, straight here at WP: Cockapoo. :-) Poepkop (talk) 21:28, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

FYI: User:7&6=thirteen reliably works as a ping. Even when they are speaking the same language, people misunderstand one another all the time. There is a lot more to language than mere words. Thus the difference between "translation" and "interpretation. Context, accent, sentence structure, body language, intent (subjective by speaker and listener/writer and reader) and assumptions by the speaker and listener are all part of the mix.  I've made a good living hearing those cases.  7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 16:47, 27 December 2015 (UTC)


 * @User:7&6=thirteen When I was younger I was fascinated by the idea of being able to speak with animals (this legend of Francis of Assisi, but also common thing in fairytales and many other stories), one way or the other. But on the other hand, maybe it is better this way ;-) It would be nice if one could speak with one's pets though, sometimes one wonders what an animal thinks (if anything, of course). Yes, your point as to varying interpretations, contracts being differently explained would be an example, I fear? ;-) Poepkop (talk) 16:29, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * My dogs and I communicate. I have no doubt.  We arf off to the dogh park!  <b style="color:#060">7&amp;6=thirteen</b> (<b style="color:#000">☎</b>) 16:33, 30 December 2015 (UTC)
 * :-) Poepkop (talk) 16:35, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Hello
Hello, I recently made one correction and added two long warning notices to two Wikipedia pages on the Catholic religious order known colloquially as the Josephite Fathers. The two Wikipedia pages in question were/are titled "Josephite Fathers" and "Society of Saint Joseph of the Sacred Heart." As I discovered to my surpise and alarm this morning, someone had recently deleted almost all of the history of this religious order that used to be on Wikipedia by, shockingly, removing names and references to all European and white American priests and other members of the order going back to the founding of the U.S. order by Irishman John Slattery in 1893. The only names and historical accounts remaining were to a few of the black priests (and not even all of them, as accounts of some of their most famous and pioneering early black priests were also deleted) and recent black superiors of the order. I just discovered this shocking and fraudulent vandalism to the earlier, historically-correct Wikipedia pages on the religious order as I sought to check a date in the Wikipedia entry this morning via the Wikipedia app on my phone. I am an historian who has been researching the early history of the U.S. Josephites for several years and have made quick consultations of the previously-correct Wikipedia entries on the Josephites many times. Who are you and what are your qualifications on this subject? A few minutes after I made the correction and added the notes this morning, you removed them, and did so without reinstating the historically-correct, unvandalised former Wikipedia pages on the religious order, as requested in my note. If you would like to learn more about this religious order and confirm my complaint, there is a long academic record of books and articles on this order, most notably Stephen Ochs, Desegregating the Altar: The Josephites and the Struggle for Black Priests, 1871-1960 (Baton Rouge: LSU Press, 1990). Please kindly reinstate the full, historically-correct Wikipedia page on the Josephite Fathers that existed on Wikipedia prior to the vandalised version that I discovered this morning. IP 66*87.81.5
 * IP, if you have concerns about the actual content of said articles, please go to their respective Talkpages (each Article has a Talkpage for discussions pertaining to the content) and write down your concern there (your "warning notices"), surely it will be followed up, please do not insert it into the actual Article. And no, this John Slattery, that was inserted with this edit, was born in 1962 and therefore can impossibly be the founder of something that was founded in 1892/3. Poepkop (talk) 16:38, 27 December 2015 (UTC)

pending changes reviewer/rollback
Hello Poepkop. Your account has been [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=rights&user=&page=User%3A granted] the "rollbacker" and "pending changes reviewer" user rights. These user rights allow you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes and quickly revert the edits of other users.


 * Rollback user right
 * Please keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:
 * Rollback should never be used to edit war.
 * Rollback should be used to revert clear cases of vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
 * Also, for some more information on how to use rollback, see New admin school/Rollback (even though you're not an admin).


 * Pending changes reviewer user right
 * The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection enabled is located at Special:StablePages. You may find the following pages useful to review:
 * Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing.
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes.
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of reviewer or rollback. If you no longer want either of these user rights, contact me and I'll remove it, alternatively you can leave a request on the administrators' noticeboard. Happy editing! Katietalk 00:10, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Emilian dialect
You know, that language is my regional one, precious and great for me: therefore any shield for it is really welcome :-D (forgive my imperfect English). Good bye, --Gloria (talk) 23:45, 29 December 2015 (UTC)
 * @User:Gloria sah Oh, your English is good, and you're welcome / Nessun problema :-). Poepkop (talk) 10:43, 30 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year to you too, Poepkop!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Poepkop, You too, have a prosperous, happy and great New Year, and sometimes come in eml.wkp to give us any suggestions to make it better (en.wkp of 5.045.000 artt. contra eml.wkp of 6.360 artt.) :-oop --Gloria (talk) 13:51, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to user talk pages. .

Happy New Year Poepkop!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Poepkop, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Dat GuyTalkContribs 14:42, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to user talk pages.
 * You are too kind, and I too undeserving. Thanks very much, and happy editing! (And happy new year, too, of course - can't believe I forgot that. :-) ) -- Ser Amantio di Nicolao Che dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 19:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)

Almost New Year (UTC)

 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year elves}} to send this message

Happy New Year, Poepkop!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Poepkop, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. — k6ka  <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 00:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message


 * ''By the way, did you know that this edit was the last edit made in 2015, and this is the first edit of 2016? (Times in UTC, of course). — k6ka  <span title="Canadian!" style="color:red">🍁 ( Talk ·  Contributions ) 00:13, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No, but now I do :-) On WP there is always something to do ;-) Poepkop (talk) 14:46, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Poepkop!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Poepkop, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  10:38, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

hny
thanks for your wishes, the telling thing will be, how many years do you think you will last on wp en? not meant to be a sour reply, but hey, hopes it is a few... JarrahTree 13:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
 * , oh I hope for many years to come to be of some use here, though not always equally active or present I guess :-) Poepkop (talk) 14:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Poepkop!
<div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Poepkop, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. – Davey 2010 Merry Xmas / Happy New Year 23:31, 1 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

== Happy New Year, Poepkop! == <div style="border: 3px solid #FFD700; background-color: #FFFAF0; padding:0.2em 0.4em;border-radius: 1em; box-shadow: 0.1em 0.1em 0.5em rgba(0,0,0,0.75);" class="plainlinks">

Happy New Year! Poepkop, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. Ekabhishektalk 04:07, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Spread the WikiLove; use {{subst:Happy New Year 2016}} to send this message

A cheeseburger for you!

 * :-) Thank yous. I thought Sandboxes, of all places on WP, were nice and quiet, but no ... :-) At your service so don't eat too long ;-) Poepkop (talk) 16:59, 3 January 2016 (UTC).

Some cupcakes for you!

 * Hello and thank you. Vandalism seems like a sport to some vandals? Mmmm.. I might have to postpone my diet plans with these cupcakes, though :-) Poepkop (talk) 13:32, 4 January 2016 (UTC).

A barnstar for you!

 * Hello, thank you for that, my first barnstar, yeah! Well, not constantly though, only Cluebot can :-). Poepkop (talk) 16:28, 6 January 2016 (UTC).

Happy 2016
Hi Poepkop. Many thanks for your your New Year wishes, and a very happy one to you too! Best, Voceditenore (talk) 08:42, 8 January 2016 (UTC)

List of Islamist terrorist attacks
Read my edit summary. Read the page history. Read my message on the Talk page. Joobo is adding original research, and I will continue to remove it. So shove your threat to block me up your ass. 63.116.31.198 (talk) 17:38, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * What is "original research" about content with references (regardless of who added it)? And no, I think I will leave my ass in peace. Poepkop (talk) 18:19, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Having a source doesn't mean it's not original research. The source has to say that the incident was a terrorist attack and attribute it to Islamists, or else it's OR to call it an "Islamist terrorist attack". Did you look at my talk page comment, or at any of the sources? 66.87.114.248 (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
 * PS -- I'm sorry for the personal attack, but a level 4im vandalism warning is not appropriate for a content dispute in which the editor leaves edit summaries. 66.87.114.248 (talk) 21:05, 8 January 2016 (UTC)