User talk:Horshammuseum

Image copyright problem with Image:Horsham Museum Front.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Horsham Museum Front.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 16:34, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Greetings
Hey there. Can you have a think about what copyrights will be used for the images that might be going up here? I'm really not certain on this front, which makes it difficult to do much :) Thanks Chris Simpson aka Jonru (talk) 14:19, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Horsham Museum
Hello. thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia, I've noticed that you have made some uncited additions to the article Horsham Museum, please cite a reliable source for your additions. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Citing sources for how to cite sources. Also you might want to consider changing your username as your current one gives the impression that you represent the museum. Thank you. Grim23 ★ 14:03, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

COI and username policy
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, the username you have chosen (Horshammuseum) seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of a group, company or website.

There are two issues with this :
 * 1) It is possible that you have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, you must exercise great caution when editing on topics related to your organization or adding links to its website.
 * 2) Your account cannot represent a group of people. You may wish to create a new account with a username that represents only you. Alternatively, you may consider changing your username to avoid giving the impression that your personal account is being used for promotional purposes.

Regardless of whether you change your name or create a new account, you are not exempted from the guidelines concerning editing where you have a conflict of interest. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Yunshui (talk) 09:13, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Vandalism
Please to not destroy links as you did with this edit on the Inca Empire  -  Gallo glass  10:18, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Please note
Welcome to Wikipedia. Because we have a policy against usernames that give the impression that the account represents a group, organization or website, I have blocked this account; please take a moment to create a new account with a username that represents only you. You should also read our conflict of interest guideline. If your username doesn't represent a group, organization or website, you may appeal this username block by adding the text below this notice. Thank you. -- The Anome (talk) 10:32, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of George Marshall (philanthropist)


The article George Marshall (philanthropist) has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Not notable; DuckDuckGo search for 'George Marshall' 'horsham' 'curate' returns no sources, only WP, mirrors, and adminstrative-records aggregators analyzing whether George Marshall lived in Horsham, PA."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 1 July 2022 (UTC)