User talk:Hortobagy

Original Research Warning: May 2013
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Roma in Hungary, but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. K &oelig;rte F  a  { ταλκ }  21:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Romani autonomy in Hungary
Hello Hortobagy,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Romani autonomy in Hungary for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, :.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. little green rosetta $central scrutinizer (talk)$ 15:42, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Edit warring
You have engaged in edit warring on Origin of Hungarians. Your edits have been undone by multiple users, yet you continue to revert these users to assert your own version. This is a violation of Wikipedia policies. Instead, you should engage the other users in a civil discussion so that consensus can be reached. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:11, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * You have been reported at WP:3RRNB for continued reversion of other users' edits to Origin of Hungarians. Continued edit warring will likely result in revocation of your editing privileges.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Romani autonomy in Hungary


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Romani autonomy in Hungary requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. smileguy91talk 20:20, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

ANI
You have been reported. Fakirbakir (talk) 20:58, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013
You have been blocked from editing for a period of one week for edit warring and disruptive editing, as you did at Origin of Hungarians. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:33, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback
Q VVERTYVS (hm?) 16:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for immediately upon release of block, continuing the edit war that got you previously blocked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 17:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC)