User talk:HotHat/Archived Talk of 2013-05

Annie Up
Thanks. I added a few things but it looks good the way it is. Eric444 (talk) 11:46, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 Players Championship, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages U.S. Amateur Championship and David Lynn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:33, 19 May 2013 (UTC)

Big Four
Are you planning to nominate this article for deletion? I'm not necessarily supportive of the idea but I was intrigued nevertheless. Spiderone 21:10, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Is the "Trivalry" (i.e. Federer, Nadal and Djokovic) an article, which is more supportive by sourcing than "Big Four"? See User:JayJ47/The Trivalry. Federer has seventeen slams and one silver in singles and gold in doubles, Nadal has eleven slams and a gold in singles, Djokovic has six slams and one bronze, so my question is: Murray just has one slam and one gold in singles, so does this really merit him to join the other three amongst the pantheon? I think not, but that is my opinion on the matter. So, I am just trying to get tennis to clarify and codify things, before things spin out of control. Do we have a Borg-Conners-McEnroe-Lendl page, which would be more apropos than this so-called "Big Four"? I might propose it for deletion, but that depends on what Murray does this year. If you are so beholden to the "Big Four" article, why don't we go back and recreate the Trivalry page? On another note, why don't we go back and recreate the Federer–Murray rivalry, which was deleted in an inappropriate and reckless manner, which was because Fyunck(click) did not alert the significant contributors to that article to weigh in and comment. So lets do this right. I think if the Djokovic–Murray rivalry is kept it sets a disastrous precedent against the other. I thought and still think F–M is a rivalry, and it is referred to in the press like D-M is, too. So, if it is kept, I will be taking the matter to the administrators notice board, and getting the F-M article reinstated outright because policy was not followed.HotHat (talk) 00:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)