User talk:HotHat/Archived Talk of 2013-06

Disambiguation link notification for June 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mala (Devendra Banhart album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mojo (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

June 2013
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=558543643 your edit] to Spitfire (LeAnn Rimes album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20&section=new my operator's talk page].


 * Could you take a look at Death Magnetic? Your opinion about promoting it into A class article according to the quality scale.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 19:53, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Also check the B class rating for Metallica (album), thank you very much.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 13:19, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Please go through out the remaining studio albums: Kill 'Em All, Ride the Lightning, Master of Puppets, Load, and ReLoad.--Вик Ретлхед (talk) 13:49, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Helpful link
WikiProject Albums/Review sitesHotHat (talk) 07:30, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

The Lone Bellow (album) genres
An anon has been removing some of the sourced genres o The Lone Bellow (album). When I checked the reference for Christian rock, it didn't mention the genre. Perhaps you can explain on the article's talk page. Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:41, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Praxis makes perfect
You have established notability, given plenty of refs and strived for balance, so it looks pretty good. One thing I would do is mention the chart position in the lead, since that is what the notability relies on. If you could get sales figures, that would be good.

If you want some nitpicking, the lead is a bit short, I don't get much sense of what the lyrics are about from the comment-style first section, and there's not much point in a sortable table when there is only one row. Thanks for making the effort to salvage this  Jimfbleak -  talk to me?  16:59, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

One last change
Hi HH. :) I found one last change, for better flow. It's for the very last sentence in the lead.

CURRENT: In his playing career, Nadal's two biggest tennis rivalries have been against Federer and Novak Djokovic.

CHANGE TO: His two biggest career rivalries have been against Federer and Novak Djokovic.

The word "tennis" doesn't need to used because when we talk about his "career rivalries" we're obviously talking about tennis. Thanks! --76.189.109.155 (talk) 07:07, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

The Writer's Barnstar goes to you!
Have a wonderful day!  srsrox  BlahBlahBlah...   05:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Swon Brothers
Those sources look okay. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 22:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Oh didn't know about that. In that case, don't use 'em since they show place of birth and other vital info. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Nadal
Hi again Hothat. :) An editor made this edit, which changed the very careful and accurate wording we used (which also is very similar to the wording in the Federer article). "Widely regarded" is improperly in Wikipedia's voice and therefore steps into POV territory, whereas our wording is very fair and is supported by the attached sources. So can you please revert that edit and put it back to the words we decided on last week? Thanks! --76.189.109.155 (talk) 02:59, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I see you fixed it. But can you just remove the word "this" from "and this has led". It should just be "and has led..." like we had it before. You may also want to put in your edit summary that your reverts are to restore the original wording. Editors may not realize that it was the wording previously used. Thanks, again. :) --76.189.109.155 (talk) 03:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Btw, I thought this edit you made was excellent. Nice catch! Also, it seems very odd that the very first section in Roger Federer (after the lead) is the "Personal life" section, rather than starting with an "Early life" section and then having a separate "Personal life" section at the bottom (before the stats). --76.189.109.155 (talk) 03:18, 26 June 2013 (UTC)