User talk:Hourstone

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hourstone (November 25)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hourstone and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Hourstone, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "db-self" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hourstone Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jovanmilic97&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Hourstone reviewer's talk page].
 * You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 10:31, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

Draft:Hourstone


Hello, Hourstone. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, Draft:Hourstone.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 06:48, 26 May 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing. Additionally, If you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for your contributions to Wikipedia, you must disclose who is paying you to edit.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:
 * Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
 * Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block. To do so, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the text at the bottom of your talk page, replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason for thinking that the block was an error, and publish the page. NJA  &#124; talk  12:44, 27 May 2019 (UTC)


 * I was going to decline this as the user didn’t address the username aspect of the block. However I realized they believe there has been discussion between us previously and asked me to not review the situation. Therefore I am not, but honestly I cannot reply to anything in the unblock request. Any reviewing admin should note the block also refers to the username being inappropriate as it implies it represents a group or otherwise is not a personal account of an individual. Further, and as a note, no required declarations per WP:PAID have been made. I know the user denies this concern, though even if true the username remains an issue based on deleted contributions and hits on the edit filter. NJA  &#124; talk  19:10, 27 May 2019 (UTC)
 * The sources you added were a homepage and social media. PhilKnight (talk) 21:35, 27 May 2019 (UTC)