User talk:HouseGecko

Ways to improve Liyangan
Hi, I'm Boleyn. HouseGecko, thanks for creating Liyangan!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Thanks for creating this.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 14:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for all your work on List of religions and spiritual traditions
They are impressive contributions!

Ways to improve Dewi Lanjar
Hi, I'm Boleyn. HouseGecko, thanks for creating Dewi Lanjar!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing more sources.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 19:13, 21 August 2017 (UTC)

Piped links
Hello, HouseGecko. Just FYI, when you linked from Juno (mythology) to the articles on various Roman deities, you forgot to check the accuracy of all your wikilinks. You correctly linked to the goddess Ceres, but not to the rest. In most cases, the various planetary bodies named after Roman deities take precedence over the deities themselves. There's also no need to link the same term or name twice in a single infobox. Thanks for reading this. Haploidavey (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * User:Haploidavey Oh, sorry, I was in a hurry when I added the links. I will be more careful when I add links in the future. HouseGecko (talk) 16:48, 3 March 2018 (UTC)
 * OK, thanks :) Haploidavey (talk) 16:53, 3 March 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Libertas, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pileus ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Libertas check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Libertas?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 4 March 2018 (UTC)

Pre-Islamic Arabian deities
Hi. Regarding your last edit there, would you suggest a better way to include that or a similar statement? SamEV (talk) 21:15, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

GA nomination for Religion in pre-Islamic Arabia?
Hello, HouseGecko. I was thinking that Religion in pre-Islamic Arabia may be ready for a GA nomination. I wrote most of the stuff on Mecca and Judaism there, which I can vouch for, but I'm not very familiar with some other parts of the article. You've done great work on it and you seem to be well-versed in this topic. What do you think? Eperoton (talk) 02:43, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 * I think it might be ready for GA-nomination. I've went ahead and nominated it.HouseGecko (talk) 10:28, 22 February 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Religion in pre-Islamic Arabia
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Religion in pre-Islamic Arabia you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 13:40, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Religion in pre-Islamic Arabia
The article Religion in pre-Islamic Arabia you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Religion in pre-Islamic Arabia for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cerebellum -- Cerebellum (talk) 14:01, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Al-Lat
The article Al-Lat you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Al-Lat for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of A. Parrot -- A. Parrot (talk) 05:40, 24 March 2019 (UTC)

Ways to improve Funkot
Hello, HouseGecko,

Thank you for creating Funkot.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

"some sections unreferenced"

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with. Remember to sign your reply with. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Josey Wales Parley 22:07, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

I-pop moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, I-pop, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 19:53, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:I-pop has a new comment
 I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:I-pop. Thanks! AngusW🐶🐶F ( bark  •  sniff ) 20:07, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Input request @ Talk:Jinn

 * An input request has been relisted to have more inputs about DUE/UNDUE relevance and fringe-ness at Talk:Jinn.
 * An input request has been relisted to have more inputs about DUE/UNDUE relevance and fringe-ness at Talk:Jinn.
 * Also A user has proposed updates for consideration at this sand box for the article Jinn.

As a discussion facilitator fyi a WP:DUE discussion (some aspects may touch WP:Fringe) is at Talk:Jinn stage's WP:RSN and WP:ORN step. After RSN and WP:ORN step, RfC formatting is likely to be discussed at Talk:Jinn in a new sub section.

This input request / intimation is made to you, looking at your previous contribution to the article Religion in pre-Islamic Arabia (Xtool) or talk page there of. &#32;Bookku   (talk) 12:48, 23 May 2024 (UTC)