User talk:HouseMoney44001

May 2018
Hello, HouseMoney44001, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who use multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. – Muboshgu (talk) 03:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Ronna McDaniel shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.This includes your edits as DragonEnergy. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)

Please explain how any of the edits that I have made are not cited properly or relevant to the page that I edited? Each one used reputable sources that were clearly marked. The special elections are relevant as the RNC spent money (see my most recent revisions to cite) on them. The DNC chair Tom Perez's account has special elections on it so clearly they are relevant. HouseMoney44001 (talk) 04:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
 * This would be better addressed on the article's talk page, but since you asked, there's nothing in that content that's specific to McDaniel, only to the RNC. I am not looking at Perez's page, if something is there that shouldn't be there, it should be taken out too. – Muboshgu (talk) 04:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)