User talk:Houseofcrowns

Welcome!
Hello, Houseofcrowns, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Houseofcrowns, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! User:Usien6 16:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Houseofcrowns


A tag has been placed on User:Houseofcrowns, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. User:Usien6 16:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Houseofcrowns, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Houseofcrowns/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! User:Usien6 16:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Houseofcrowns/sandbox


A tag has been placed on User:Houseofcrowns/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. User:Usien6 16:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Houseofcrowns, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft:Nomni, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! User:Usien6 16:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Nomni


A tag has been placed on Draft:Nomni, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. User:Usien6 16:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Welcome!
Hello, Houseofcrowns, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Draft talk:Nomni, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! User:Usien6 16:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft talk:Nomni


A tag has been placed on Draft talk:Nomni, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. User:Usien6 16:27, 21 December 2017 (UTC)

Is there no privacy here is there no protection for works in draft mode only! Why is possible for people to delete "MY PRIVATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY". Can you please give me a real reason why the private draft in my sandbox was deleted?

Houseofcrowns (talk) 04:25, 22 December 2017 (UTC)

Reply
Hi, thanks for message.

Quite a lot of disturbing behaviour here.
 * This is something we not getting paid for nor did we post anything in the article—who is "we"? You cannot edit on behalf of a company or group. I note that you have only made minor edits apart from this topic. If you don't have a conflict of interest, as you claim, I suggest you write about something else.
 * You appear to have created multiple copies of this article, despite have created no other article,looks like mass spamming.
 * You removed, and  tags added by editor  without making any attempt to fix the issues. This doesn't look like good faith editing, you don't own the article
 *  other third party members who also would like to contribute to the first draft — what you post has to be able to survive on its own, although obviously all articles are capable of improvement
 * you did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or product, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Your text has no references of any kind. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
 * without independent third-party references, there is no way we can tell whether anything you have written is true, or whether it meets our notability criteria if it is. Some of you text seems to be about bitcoin rather than the topic of the article anyway.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic. Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include:  official digital asset & cryptocurrency... world citizen users can create their own currencies... nomni which is considered legal tender... Notable Verified Assets... users can create their own currencies inside the bitcoin blockchain... can benefit from the convenience... one of the most powerful Counterparty features... 100% compatible with Ethereum ... pretty much all contracts can be run on both platforms without code changes... it is better to use a Counterparty-based crowdfunding platform... This will provide your users trust, and demonstrate the legitimacy of your project.
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites.
 * Most of your text was created in large blocks without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. You also claim it is MY PRIVATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, so you are asserting that you own the text and are exercising your copyright. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Since you have no no connection to this topic, I strongly suggest that you write about something else. Since the article was already a draft when I deleted it, there is no point restoring it, as unsourced spam it will be deleted again. you also claim that you own the text and Wikipedia cannot amend it, as in your reply to the previous message, whcih is incompatible with editing here.

If you attempt to write an article again, whether on this, or another subject, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article.

<b style="font-family:Lucida;color:red">Jimfbleak</b> - talk to me?  06:54, 23 December 2017 (UTC) Thank you! You gave much clarity on what need to be done.


 * This is something we not getting paid for nor did we post anything in the article—who is "we"? You cannot edit on behalf of a company or group. I note that you have only made minor edits apart from this topic. If you don't have a conflict of interest, as you claim, I suggest you write about something else.
 * You appear to have created multiple copies of this article, despite have created no other article,looks like mass spamming.

The "We" I' am referring to is the different members of counterparty who are participate in project for nomni the first draft on that platform.

I didn't know I though they were all drafts that was my first contribution so I figure everything was only in sandbox mode. Until I got a response on what correction was needed. I am raw baby here so I was giving anytime to correct anything. I step away after submitting the last private draft I was templating for review on improvements.
 * You appear to have created multiple copies of this article, despite have created no other article,looks like mass spamming.

You removed, and  tags added by editor  without making any attempt to fix the issues. This doesn't look like good faith editing, you don't own the article

This is again due to my official 2 day here ignorance because if I removed that I am not really sure how I did. I am still fresh to how this platform works. I wasn't given time really to learn. I was still trying to figure out who to respond to and why it got deleted. Here this dialog gives great clarity. And no not one it's public the template I was drafting is what I was mentioning in my personal sandbox as it says. So I figure I could draft articles about the other tokens on the counterparty platform here. Utilizing the same article template. As a prelate to create pages for the other coins on the platform. The article far as the draft. I asked for some clarity earlier on this. But it wasn't giving like this. I mention the vagueness in the critique when I ask for help. This is ask in regards to personal sandbox when I mention PRIVATE WORKS meaning the drafts in my sandbox. I kinda understood the deletion part far as not accepting the draft to not going public. But the personal sandbox is what I didn't understand the reasoning for and no clarity was giving like this on the matter.

These are others who use the coins of counterparty ecosystem. The tokens that are the platform don't have their own informative pages. I shared the first draft with some of them to see what needs to be improved on and how we can work on future articles for the other tokens that are verifiable the counterparty ecosystem.
 *  other third party members who also would like to contribute to the first draft — what you post has to be able to survive on its own, although obviously all articles are capable of improvement.


 * you did not provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or product, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management. Your text has no references of any kind. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.

This right here is exactly what I seek help with from the other community members that want to give there verifiable resources. But that helps me greatly with what needs to be corrected. This is exactly all I was asking for earlier. I need assist with this. This is my second day just contributing here. I am just a newbie so please all I ask is for understanding on that because this is only just my second day here. I was trying to cover alot of work on the information in my personal sandbox before I called it a night. When I wake up early the next morning the article is gone. And the personal drafts which I figured would still be there fore me to correct for improvements on the articles about the token on the counterparty community. I sure there is a Rarepepe article page; which is another counterparty token. but please once again excuse my ignorance on this. If allow I would like to make the proper improvements needed.


 * without independent third-party references, there is no way we can tell whether anything you have written is true, or whether it meets our notability criteria if it is. Some of you text seems to be about bitcoin rather than the topic of the article anyway.

This is only due to me being here for a day or so. I wanted assistance with so the third party references that wanted to contribute mentioned the article draft was deleted and they couldn't add the contributions. I didn't understand that because it was deleted before I could fully understand why. I read around couldn't understand why. The information is about a cryptocurrency token asset on the counterparty platform that has its other tokens listed on the main counterparty Wikipedia page.

I have no problem correcting any part that come off this way. As I mention I am baby here.
 * it was written in a promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic.

Examples of unsourced or self-sourced claims presented as fact include: '' official digital asset & cryptocurrency... world citizen users can create their own currencies... nomni which is considered legal tender... Notable Verified Assets... users can create their own currencies inside the bitcoin blockchain... can benefit from the convenience... one of the most powerful Counterparty features... 100% compatible with Ethereum ... pretty much all contracts can be run on both platforms without code changes... it is better to use a Counterparty-based crowdfunding platform... This will provide your users trust, and demonstrate the legitimacy of your project.''
 * there shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections. That's particularly the case when they are spamlinks to affiliated sites.

Now the digital asset "Nomni" is a verifiable asset on the "Counterparty" ecosystem which allows people to issue digital assets which is what the platform calls it itself. Which this can be verified as well. But my verbiage I do seek assistance with; I understand what I am trying to convey in a better encylopaedic tone can be improved. If you don't mind offering assistance with this to I and others who want to contribute there their third party reference material that would be greatly honored.


 * Most of your text was created in large blocks without wikilinks or references, and looks as if was copied from an unknown and possibly copyrighted source. You also claim it is MY PRIVATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY, so you are asserting that you own the text and are exercising your copyright. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. Text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

This is only cause this is my second day here. And in regard to "MY PRIVATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY" I was only making reference to the "personal sandbox" draft to become a public article which I was going to use as my main template to start articles for other counterparty tokens. I had no time to fix any before being deleted and once I figure out how to actually respond I didn't get the same clarity as I am getting now in your response.

""Since you have no no connection to this topic, I strongly suggest that you write about something else. Since the article was already a draft when I deleted it, there is no point restoring it, as unsourced spam it will be deleted again. you also claim that you own the text and Wikipedia cannot amend it, as in your reply to the previous message, whcih is incompatible with editing here.""

Please can you restore it as I do plan on make the proper improvements. I am part of the counterparty community. There is many verifiable tokens on the platform just the nomni. I did really get a chance to finish the referencing because before I could get them to contribute the sources it got delete but I will take out all urls and use only wiki cited material.

If you attempt to write an article again, whether on this, or another subject, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources. Also read Your first article.

I can give source materials. I didn't respond and or learn what was wrong fast enough to change the tone in the article I was under the assumption the sandbox was personal. Which I submit the draft for the assistance I just got here so if it's okay can you please restore the draft for me and can I message you somewhere to check if it's proper before submission?

Thank you truly for your genuine help!

Houseofcrowns (talk) 09:06, 23 December 2017 (UTC)