User talk:Houston Matt

May 2016
Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:


 * User contributions
 * Recent changes
 * Watchlists
 * Revision differences
 * IRC channels
 * Related changes
 * New pages list
 * Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Snuggums (talk / edits) 05:49, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Per User talk:98.201.144.119, please do not add long strings of address details to infoboxes or articles. The details should be just sufficient to disambiguate the place from other places of the same name. It is not necessary or desirable to have a long string of additional trivia. DrKay (talk) 15:54, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

As you were told at User talk:98.201.144.119, do not continue with edits after concerns have been raised about them. If you continue to perform edits that you know are controversial and disputed, you will be blocked from editing. DrKay (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 18:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Garchy. I noticed that you made a change to an article, John Jacob Astor IV, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. ''Hello, I removed your edits as they are uncited - if you can provide sources for the changes you're making to the article please place them back! Thanks, Garchy'' Garchy (talk) 14:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources. Garchy (talk) 19:02, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Widr (talk) 19:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

July 2016
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for continuing to make edits that you know are disputed and against consensus.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. DrKay (talk) 16:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * Alexander III of Russia
 * added a link pointing to Dagmar of Denmark


 * Alfred, Duke of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha
 * added a link pointing to Windsor

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Edit-warring
Your recent editing history at Ava Lowle Willing shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. The article history there shows that you have repeatedly undone the reverts of multiple users without edit summaries or discussion on the talk page, from both this account and. DrKay (talk) 15:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

September 2016
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. Snuggums (talk / <b style="color:#454545">edits</b>) 19:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Please stop inserting religion into infoboxes and needlessly expanding addresses in infoboxes. Infoboxes should be summaries of basic information only, not a repository for irrelevant detail. DrKay (talk) 20:00, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Please note the previous requests from June. If you continue to perform edits after being asked not to do so, you will be blocked. DrKay (talk) 20:04, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

October 2016
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Albert, Prince Consort. Your edits introduced inaccurate or misleading information and have been reverted. Albert did not become a Prince of the United Kingdom until 1857 and Victoria did not die in 1861. Thank you. Celia Homeford (talk) 06:40, 13 October 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely. I asked you not to insert religion into infoboxes, or strings of detailed addresses, and warned you not to continue to perform disputed edits. You have ignored those warnings and those requests. DrKay (talk) 19:07, 13 October 2016 (UTC)