User talk:Hovelander

Please don't re-create the article Skilt, unless you can verify that it is true via reliable references. Thank you. - Mike Rosoft 08:01, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

Sorry for the supposed nonsense. Just getting my feet wet in the world of wikipedia-ness. But the garment idea exits and is so glorious as to need some enlightenment. Have included reference.
 * The following comment: "I can only hope that the coined word grows as a meme" on the article's talk page establishes that the article has no place on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a place to coin neologisms or to promote ideas you have come up with. Please don't re-create it. - Mike Rosoft 11:00, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

And yet there is an entry for the Skort? This is where I can see the rumblings about wikipedia being hostile and delete heavy against new contributions/users. Skort has notability and viability without references, yet the term "skilt" even though it exists in manufactured reality does not. Is it true that if it were mentioned on television that this article would not be so contentious? I have learned much my delete heavy handed wikipedia friends. Hovelander Aug 1, 2k7