User talk:HowAboutNo91

Cool categories
I am impressed by your observation of the value of consolidating notable athletes who are also criminals in various sports. I have created some more subcategories of Category:American athletes convicted of crimes. I would like to create one for pro wrestlers if it gets big enough but am not sure what to call it yet so I am just putting them in the main category.

Once they go in a subcategory we would remove them from the main category. Ranze (talk) 04:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

ANI notice
There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. 2601:188:1:AEA0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 13:47, 22 June 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright
Hello HowAboutNo91, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Aundre Bumgardner has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.


 * You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
 * Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
 * Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Copyrights. You may also want to review Copy-paste.
 * If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Donating copyrighted materials.
 * In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
 * Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 03:12, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

incorrect information
In the article, List of American state and local politicians convicted of crimes, you need to demonstrate how the information is incorrect; otherwise, you will continue to be reverted by various editors. Hmains (talk) 02:54, 17 August 2016 (UTC)

Far from being a reformed editor, your community ban discussion talks about repeated copyright violations and the Wikipedia and copyright section above would suggest you still haven't learned about copyright. Mo ainm ~Talk  12:39, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * You are mention 'repeated copyright violations', they are from 2011, it is now 2016, so 5 years later and there is only one copyright violation on this account over months and months of editing, the article itself was allowed to stay as there was only a small violation. HowAboutNo91 (talk) 12:57, 7 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Furthermore I find it fascinating that you ~Talk  haven't edited once since the 15th July 2016, yet all of a sudden, a few months later, you re-appear on wikipedia, the very day I ask to be unblocked and comment on my talk page. Methinks you might be a sock puppet yourself as how else would you have known about what I had put on my talk page, since you haven't edited in 2 months. HowAboutNo91 (talk) 13:02, 7 September 2016 (UTC)

As you are not eligible for unblock consideration here (and likely not eligible on your master account until you have avoided editing for at least six months), I'm revoking talk page access here. You are welcome to request an unblock on your master account and/or using WP:UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 13:08, 7 September 2016 (UTC)