User talk:HowardBerry/Archive2

Mediation
Hi HowardBerry, Since Sanhedrin hasn't responded to the mediation he requested, I'm relieving you and Stephenb of your promises not to edit the Cult television article. If Sanhedrin does come back, I've requested that he join the mediation before editing the article, and so we'd be able to start it up again. Thanks, &mdash; Asbestos | Talk   (RFC)  14:20, 12 December 2005 (UTC)

Hi - Sanhedrin has added to the mediation discussion at last - I've posted a rebuttal but I'd welcome your support Stephenb (Talk) 15:27, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

D'oh - forget that - I hadn't noticed you'd changed your tag to be Howie :-) Still, would welcome any addition to the discussion! Stephenb (Talk) 15:30, 15 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi all,
 * I've closed the mediation. Let me know if you have any further questions, and good luck with any future discussions. &mdash; Asbestos | Talk   (RFC)  14:38, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!
Many thanks for your support during my RfA – following a 30/0/0 vote I’ve now been made an admin. Do have a Jaffa Cake! Cheers, CLW 13:59, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Sylvia and Gerry Anderson
Hi. I wanted to call your attention to a mini-poll I've launched on the talk page for the Sylvia and Gerry Anderson article. I believe this article should be split into two separate articles, one for each person, and as someone who regularly contributes to Anderson-related articles, I'd like to get your thoughts on this. Thanks! 23skidoo 13:10, 25 January 2006 (UTC)

"rv. Don't make pointless edits. Self promotion is so obvious."
Regarding this edit, ok, firstly, it isn't pointless, see Bad links. Secondly, I have no idea what "self promotion" is about, was I promoting myself somehow? for what possible gain? Bizarre. And if you genuinely believed the edit to be "pointless" then why on earth did you go to the hassle of reverting it? surely that is even more pointless. Even more bizarre. Martin 01:46, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Ok, in that case it is fine, I should have guessed it was something like that. I was not upset, more just incredulous, but all is good now, regards Martin 09:24, 24 March 2006 (UTC)


 * Also, I just noticed the note at the top of this page, you're obviously a good guy, it would be a shame if you reduced your input, and it you only have to spend a few seconds looking through my talk archives to find loads of mistakes I have made! Plus you didnt really do anything wrong, I was just jumping to conclusions. Martin 09:32, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Mistakes
We all make mistakes, it's part of editing. I seem to be able to make one or two a day judgeing by the "happy" comments I get on my talk page. For the most part it's best to try and ignore them. Hope you feel like coming back again soon. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 05:55, 24 March 2006 (UTC)