User talk:HowardHugues2

Speedy deletion nomination of Avico
Hello HowardHugues2,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Avico for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit&section=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Steve Quinn (talk) 03:09, 27 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Prior to posting below I received this query on my talk page: . The below post pertains to the query:
 * Sorry to take this long to get back to you. As I recall, it was most of the article that was promotional in nature, and the promotional nature of the article was supported by promotional sources. Please see WP:CORPDEPTH and the sources appeared to be like those listed at WP:ORGIND. This would not have been deleted if the Admin who deleted it did not agree. Here is the deleted page and the Admin who deleted it is Alex Shih.


 * You can ask the Admin to restore it, and if that doesn't happen, then go to WP:DRV (deletion review). But you would still be dealing with unacceptable sources and a subject that is not notable per WP:N and WP:ORG. The best possible path is to put the article in the Draft space at WP:AFC until it passes muster with the reviewers there. Well, good luck. Or you can choose to work on a topic for which you have found reliable sources. ---Steve Quinn (talk) 05:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)