User talk:Howard the Duck/Archive21

WikiCup Newsletter XV
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 08:34, 4 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

File:Philippine local government.png
Error: barangays is repeated for the independent cities of an autonomous region. --seav (talk) 16:45, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I noticed that too on the file I have (probably a week ago) and I'll fix it by the weekend. – Howard  the   Duck  16:48, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
 * P.S.: If you noticed the legend for the arrows is also screwed up; I'll suggest hiding it for the meantime. – Howard  the   Duck  16:50, 13 May 2009 (UTC)

File:Philippine local government.png
This image that you made has a dashed line coming from the president... The legend on the image says that this indicates "direct relation", but the caption on the article says the president exercises only "general supervision". Is this a mistake on the image, and if so, could you fix it? Thanks. Also, a source for this chart would be good, if possible. TheCoffee (talk) 03:09, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, the right side of the chart has a line from "barangays" to more "barangays". TheCoffee (talk) 03:11, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * And I just realized Seav informed you about this right above, so nevermind. :) TheCoffee (talk) 03:12, 15 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll be fixing this when I get home later. – Howard  the   Duck  06:02, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

It should be OK now. – Howard  the   Duck  14:36, 15 May 2009 (UTC)

Re: Template:Basketballbox
Good idea. But looking at the example at User talk:Howard the Duck/Template3, I don't like how 3OT is all the way to the right next to venue name. Ideally, it should be in the center between score and venue.— Chris!  c t 05:56, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * I can't quite picture it. I've been "imagining ideas" on where to put it. Is it like this:

– Howard  the   Duck  06:02, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Look better now.— Chris!  c t 06:27, 17 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Instead of another row, I just added a nonbreaking space instead. It gives the same effect. Can I change the template now? It looks okay on IE and on other resolutions. – Howard   the   Duck  06:31, 17 May 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Newsletter XVI
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 09:10, 18 May 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Invitation
Hello, I noticed you've made edits to University of the Philippines (UP) and UP–related articles and thought you might want to support our recent proposal to create the WikiProject University of the Philippines. We've recently revamped the proposal and started a drive to push the approval of this project. We have a lot of articles that may be under this project and we would like assistance and support for its approval. Hope we'll have a very positive response. Go Fighting Maroons!

P.S. You can look at the preliminary drafts of the project in here. Thanks! -- The Wandering Traveler WIKIPROJECT UNIVERSITY OF THE PHILIPPINES NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT!  06:27, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

FLC 3b review
Hello, I noticed that a recent FLC that you nominated failed because of the criterion 3b. I have started a review of the criterion here, and any comments or opinions that you have about it would be more than welcome. Thanks, Scorpion 0422  23:20, 6 June 2009 (UTC)

Fie!
Your listing the "Red Wings win..." prospective headline above the "Penguins win..." entry at WP:ITN/C unquestionably jinxed Detroit, for whose loss you are, it seems, to blame. Now, the Pens are my favorite Eastern Conference team, and I have a proper hatred for Hockeytown, such that I'd usually be thrilled with the result, but the Pittsburgh win cost me three of my NHL playoff pools, including one in which a significant sum was at issue. How do you propose to remedy this? I think we could settle for two barnstars (where "barnstar" = "thousand dollars")... 69.212.20.241 (talk) 04:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * In my defense I posted both outcomes. Heh. – Howard  the   Duck  05:05, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Oh wait, on Game 6, there was only one possible outcome (Red Wings winning) so that was probably it. That is SOP in ITN/C anyway so... – Howard  the   Duck  05:06, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, I meant that in listing the two potential results, you posted the Red Wings item higher, unnecessarily tempting fate. But, of course, why you are to be blamed is not as important as that you are blamed.  You have been freed of your pecuniary obligations, though, by a countrymate of yours: I received today an e-mail from a gentleman who was formerly in government in the Philippines and who has millions of dollars waiting to be removed from the country, one-half of which he will share with me after I pay a small fee to assist him.  I've given over my bank information and expect to be rolling in the dough directly.  Joe 18:04, 13 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Can I have at least a share? LOL.
 * Now if someone can tell me how to jinx the Lakers... – Howard  the   Duck  18:08, 13 June 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hapee Toothpaste
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hapee Toothpaste, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This article makes no assertion of why this product is notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Matt (talk) 22:59, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * My bad, looks like you didn't have a whole lot to do with this other than the page move where Twinkle identified you as the original author. Sorry for the inconvenience.  Matt (talk) 23:05, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * These gadgets are like bots -- they get to be really stupid sometimes... – Howard  the   Duck  02:00, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

The local government unit daigram
Hi I'm a grad student from UST. I just want to ask from where did you get the organizational chart of the Local Government units? is it the official? Thanks so much!

Ray John —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.147.26.10 (talk) 00:45, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
 * I got it from a book written by the provincial administrator of Bulacan, although I forgot who she is or the title. I'd look for it later. – Howard  the   Duck  04:37, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

ok. thanks so much!could the book be "Philippine Politics and Governance: Challenges to Democratization and Development" by Encarnacion, Tadem?

Ray John
 * I'll look for it at a library later today. – Howard  the   Duck  22:41, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Problem with DYK
Hello! there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath and respond there as soon as possible. Geraldk (talk) 01:28, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

SVGified logo
You are invited to participate in a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football. Arteyu ? Blame it on me !  17:20, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

Bold Text
Please do not take out the bold text in articles like All My Life (TV series) and Adik Sa'Yo. The bold text is very important. What if a reader read this page and could not see? The bold text makes it easier to understand the words. Do not revert my edits on the said article. Thank You GMA Fan 6:44PM 23 July 2009 (UTC)
 * LOL. I'll this to a third party, which WILL rule in my favor. – Howard  the   Duck  08:54, 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Please stop taking away the bold text. The bold text is very important. I'm one of those people who can't see very well so I have to boldface the text so i can read it. Other people can't read light text. Please stop taking away the bold text in articles. Thank You for your cooperation. GMA Fan 3:54PM 24 July 2009 (UTC)

Please be aware of the three revert rule in your edits on Adik Sa'Yo. This appears to be a content dispute and all parties are subject to block if reverting without discussion continues. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 00:21, 25 July 2009 (UTC)

OK, i give up. I won't bold text anymore. Is that all right with you? Please send me a reply. Thank You. GMA Fan 11:07PM 24 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Good. It is senseless to boldface them without lengthy summaries anyway. – Howard  the   Duck  13:39, 25 July 2009 (UTC)


 * I Promise i will not bold text in articles like Zorro (Philippine TV series). If someone bold text in that article, let me know. Are we friends now? Please send me a reply.

Thank You for your cooperation. GMA Fan

Hypothetical situations
I wonder could they be given their own page (Wikipedia:In the news section on the Main Page/Hypothetical situations) as they seem like a good idea, will soon disappear into the archives and are taking up much of the talk page anyway? I just noticed them and perhaps there are those who have not. -- can  dle &bull; wicke  23:21, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
 * You can do anything with it. – Howard  the   Duck  00:16, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Done. -- can  dle &bull; wicke  03:50, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

UP Diliman
Check this out Talk:University_of_the_Philippines,_Diliman --Dihamsal (talk) 11:59, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:NCAA Philippines new logo.PNG)
Thanks for uploading File:NCAA Philippines new logo.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:10, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Gilas logo.png)
 Thanks for uploading File:Gilas logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. FileBot (talk) 21:38, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Interesting signature
I didnt wanna fix it before showing/asking. ur last comment at ITN/C. how did u manage to split ur signature like that lol. half of it is down the after the molecule talk. -- Ashish-g55 03:16, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * bah seems like u fixed it already -- Ashish-g55 03:18, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I originally placed my reply on that part, then I got lost due to the very long discussion, found the proper place, copied my signature to the proper place, then the last part got left out. It should be OK now. – Howard  the   Duck  03:19, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Philippine television ratings for 2008


The article List of Philippine television ratings for 2008 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This features a list of ratings of Philippine TV shows for a particular year. Do we need an article for a list of television ratings established by different TV programs?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  JL 09 q? c|undefined 15:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of List of Philippine television ratings for 2009


The article List of Philippine television ratings for 2009 has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * This features a list of ratings of Philippine TV shows for a particular year. Do we need an article for a list of television ratings established by different TV programs?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  JL 09 q? c|undefined 15:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:NOTDIRECTORY
If you don't like WP:NOTDIRECTORY, then get consensus to have it changed. In the meantime, the schedules must go. WP:NOTDIRECTORY is explicit on this point. "an article on a ... station should not list ... current schedules". I'm very sorry you do not like our policy. Also, please note that debate surrounding a policy does not mean the policy is suspended until there is consensus. Consensus already existed to have the policy put in place. Consensus can change, but until it does change, the policy remains in place. Lack of consensus to change it does not mean consensus has changed to vacate the policy. --Hammersoft (talk) 12:58, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * But the application of the policy is disputed. The policy is not disputed, but the manner of application is. Until this is resolved (such as removal of the disputed template, I'd continue to revert that. – Howard  the   Duck  13:03, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * So you are saying that you will revert war to have your way then? --Hammersoft (talk) 13:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * No, I'm saying resolve the issue first there, to make sure the disputed template is removed. A policy/guideline with a disputed template doesn't have that much traction. – Howard  the   Duck  13:09, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * A policy/guideline with a disputed template has 100% traction until there is consensus to void it. You're quite wrong. The policy is quite explicit. There's no consensus to void it. Schedules go. If you insist on revert warring to include it, you'll find yourself blocked, I'm sure. --Hammersoft (talk) 13:16, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * On the contrary, this was also the situation with the TV episode debate a few months back, with either party quoting a policy page that is disputed which wasn't followed by everyone. Considering you are one of the people discussing the issue, I'd perhaps look for a third party to find out if there is really "a consensus" on the issue. Your insistence on this matter is related to your position in the issue; the issue has to be resolved first there. If the issue is resolved, and the disputed template is removed, then there's no more reason for me to revert. – Howard  the   Duck  13:24, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I will make an enquiry on a matter on that page, and I would like an uninvolved editor to answer me whether the policy is disputed or not. If it is still disputed, then it doesn't hold that much traction, and can be ignored. – Howard  the   Duck  13:25, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Team roster template
Hello! I was just wondering if you know where I can find some easy guide to designing and editing a basketball team roster template. Thanks in advance! ^_^ 124.105.30.10 (talk) 23:39, 22 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You can look at the code and hack it yourself. That's how I did it... – Howard  the   Duck  11:43, 23 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the tip! ^_^ BULARAN (talk) 06:36, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for File:Philippine Patriots logo.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Philippine Patriots logo.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 01:04, 15 October 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Tony Chua
Hello! Your submission of Tony Chua at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Geraldk (talk) 00:47, 17 October 2009 (UTC)

Vandalism on the Talk n' text Tropang texters ROSTER template (Ginawang Lakers!)
Greetings! So that you may know: Someone seems to have copy-pasted the names of the LA Lakers on to the TNT roster template...vandalism! Last revision on the page was from IP # 124.104.112.100. Maybe we have to see the revision history... BULARAN on 120.28.162.207 (talk) 09:53, 17 October 2009 (UTC)