User talk:Howardbm97/sandbox

Wesley's Peer Review
With your additions, I like how you have structured your sections. They are easy to follow. It seems like you have done your due diligence on your research and there's nothing lacking information wise in your sections. It would be more beneficial, however, if you could add in another source or two to strengthen your sections even more. You also do a good job of keeping the content neutral with no bias. There are a couple sentences in your sections that seem a bit wordy that could be condensed or made into multiple sentences. Overall, your sections are well done. Just try to clean up a few sentences grammatically and work in another source or two.

Wescoast11 (talk) 00:54, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

== Sydney's Peer Review

This is really well written and organized! I read through the current article about the Hulk ships before going to your sandbox and the extra information that you found is really useful. The article needs the info that you have found to add more details and give the reader a better answer than the generic, quick, summary. All of your sources seem legit, and you organized everything in a way that makes sense to the reader. You also did a good job of formatting everything so that it sounds interesting to the reader. Overall, I think that you are on the right track. Just keep an eye out for potential grammar mistakes in the existing article (I saw a few run-on sentences).

Sparksflying98 (talk) 00:01, 26 November 2018 (UTC) ==