User talk:Howel t

Danielle Smith cite needed
Hi Howel t, I've reverted you once more at Danielle Smith (politician) with regards to the tag on her ancestry, but my message to you is too long for an edit summary. First of all, WP:GRAPEVINE (section of WP:BLP) directs to "Remove any unsourced material to which an editor objects in good faith". User:All Hallow's Wraith objected to Smith's ancestry in good faith, but rather than removing the information, tagged it with cite needed. If you object to the tag, then the material should be removed per WP:BLP. On the other hand, when you tagged everything in that paragraph with, you were disrupting Wikipedia to make a point (as well as not acting in "good faith" as previously mentionned). Once again, I have reverted your edit; if you further object to this, feel free to make a posting at Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard. Note that if you continue to make reverts to Danielle Smith (politician), you may be violating WP:3RR and are liable to be blocked. -M.Nelson (talk) 02:57, 18 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi M.Nelson, go stick your head in a microwave and give yourself a tan.