User talk:Hpfan1/Archive 2

Please Note: The following are dated from April 2007 to October 2007.

AfD nomination of A&F Fragrances
An editor has nominated A&F Fragrances, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 21:56, 14 April 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Alivan's Master Wandmakers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you feel that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add  on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. – Chacor (RIP 32@VT) 14:03, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Classification of Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film)
Hello, Hpfan1. I've started a discussion at Talk:Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix (film) and I would appreciate your contribution to the topic. Thanks, Fbv65 e del / ☑t / ☛c || 18:32, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

CONCEPT 5
Perhaps someday this concept will become a reality and will be reported on in reliable sources. In the meantime the article about "CONCEPT 5" was deleted thorugh normal channels. Please don't recreate it until there are solid sources to support it. -Will Beback · † · 22:51, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Lead
You should familiarize yourself with film articles that are featured. See Featured articles. Click on the films and check out the leads. A brief synopsis of the film is included as part of the "basic" information that goes in the LEAD. A plot summary is an expansion on that information. If you feel there are spoilers in there, please remove them because there shouldn't be, but a synopsis is included.  BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  22:06, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
 * There is also a discussion about the order on the talk page. Please voice your opinion if you disagree.   BIGNOLE     (Contact me)  22:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Alivanscrest.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Alivanscrest.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:25, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:OOTP Domestic Poster.jpg.jpg
A tag has been placed on Image:OOTP Domestic Poster.jpg.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a redundant (all pixels the same or scaled down) copy of Image:OOTP Domestic Poster.jpg.jpg, in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not Commons), and all inward links have been updated (CSD I1).

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on Image_talk:OOTP Domestic Poster.jpg.jpg. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

--Android Mouse Bot 2 18:10, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Apologies for nonsensical bot edit, there are apparently a few more bugs that need to be resolved. --Android Mouse 20:26, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

May 2007
Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Pirates of the Caribbean: The Curse of the Black Pearl. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. —DerHexer (Talk) 15:15, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Harrypotter1filmposter.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Harrypotter1filmposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Aksibot 19:51, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

WP:FANCRUFT
WP:FANCRUFT might make a good read for ya. ;-) /Blaxthos 17:05, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

POTC character template
I feel the template is crappy, with hair and eye color trivial details. Fictional character template gives far more insight. Alientraveller 19:56, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Well the Harry Potter template is a lot better than the POTC template. And with comments like those you're not going to fly far here: see WP:CIVIL. Alientraveller 20:03, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

So can you explain why the template is creating a space at the top? Alientraveller 20:09, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

I don't know how to edit a template, I could screw it up. I'm not good at computer creating a template: remove the gender, eye and hair colour and maybe I will use the template. Alientraveller 20:52, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Well not gender, given it is in the main template. Alientraveller 20:55, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. Alientraveller 21:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:Pulseposter.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Pulseposter.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

A&F
If you'd like to help the A&F articles I suggest finding more 3rd-party sources. The subsidary articles are especially lacking in sources. So much so that if it doesn't change we'd be best off merging them back into the main article. Let's spend a few weeks trying to improve the sourcing and if they're still lacking then we'll deal with it. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 02:17, 13 June 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:A&Fmale.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:A&Fmale.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:52, 14 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Elizabeth pirates3.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Elizabeth pirates3.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:24, 17 June 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Harrypotter1filmposter.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Harrypotter1filmposter.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 07:31, 21 June 2007 (UTC)

Birth dates of fictional characters
Since characters like Lord Voldemort are fictional, one cannot say they are "born". This adds a decidedly in-universe flaw to an article. Please refrain from adding it in the first line of an article as if this were a real character. Thanks Ccrashh 13:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Merger of Lord Voldemort and Tom Marvolo Riddle
It appears you have recommended here merging the two articles for Lord Voldemort and Tom Marvolo Riddle. In case you forgot, this was discussed before, as recently as February, as well as with lengthy discussions before that, and the general consensus was not to merge, and furthermore the article as independant was also listed as a good article. If you want try to merge the articles again, then please start an RfC discussion yourself, and shed light on what you think has changed since the previous consensus discussion(s), and why the two articles should not therefore remain separate. If you do not intend to pursue an RfC, then please remove the tag you added, since the tag would simply reflect on the last consensus discussion, which concluded with no merger. Thanks. --T-dot ( Talk/ contribs ) 14:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Abercrombiekid.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Abercrombiekid.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MER-C 13:17, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Triwizardmaze.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Triwizardmaze.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 16:28, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Thechampionselection.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Thechampionselection.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 16:29, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:MHSCoatOfArms.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:MHSCoatOfArms.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 16:32, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:At Worlds End Maelstrom.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:At Worlds End Maelstrom.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 16:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Wizarding World of Harry Potter.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Wizarding World of Harry Potter.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG 16:33, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Scary Movie films series
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Scary Movie films series, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Scary Movie films series fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason: It does not assert the importance or significance of the Scary Movie franchiset. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Scary Movie films series, please affix the template  to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 06:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Prioriincantatemscene.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Prioriincantatemscene.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 05:55, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Lord Voldemort
Please note your revisions led the article to become 88 kilobytes. Alientraveller 21:35, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Frankly reverting to a decent version of the article, which already tries its best to summarize several very long books, is a lot easier than minor editing over time to ensure its GA status. Alientraveller 21:37, 11 August 2007 (UTC)


 * You and Alientraveller need to discuss your differing edits on the article Discussion page, and NOT in the edit summary. To use your own words: " I really hate it when some necessary edits are reverted by some Wikiuser who wants the page to continue being the way the he wants it to be. " Be aware you are doing precisely that. Please work with your fellow editos to find common ground and, failing that, get an admin or Third Opinion to weigh in on the matter.
 * Alientraveller has a considerable point. The article needs to be trimmed. better by someone like you who knows the material, right? - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  21:46, 11 August 2007 (UTC)
 * What part of 'discuss your edits was unclear? Yelling at people in edit summaries is a sure way to get you ignored at best and blocked at worst. Learn to work with people, or your ability to work with them at all will quite likely be removed. This is the second time you have been advised of this particulart problem. Please learn. - Arcayne   (cast a spell)  00:31, 14 August 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Rudimentaryform.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Rudimentaryform.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 08:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)

Redundant templates
I've left a question on Template talk:Abercrombiefitch that you may be able to address. We seem to have redundant templates and one of them should probably be deleted. If you have an opinion please comment. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 21:46, 8 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Abercrombie moose.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Abercrombie moose.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 23:03, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

Edit summary
Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing. mirageinred 20:32, 29 September 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Jessicaperez.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jessicaperez.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Brianga 17:26, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Tristynandcharlotte.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Tristynandcharlotte.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Brianga 17:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Diverse3.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Diverse3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Brianga 17:27, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Diverse4.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Diverse4.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Brianga 17:28, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:AFmodern.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:AFmodern.jpg. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Seidenstud 18:48, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Copyrighted images
You keep uploading copyrighted images that belong to other people. We can't use them. It takes time and effort for other editors and admins to keep processing and deleting them. If you want add an image to an article then go take a picture of your own and contribute it to the project. You've been an editor long enough, and have had enough notices posted on your page, to have figured this out by now. ·:· Will Beback ·:· 09:29, 3 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Abercrombie moose.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Abercrombie moose.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:07, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Hungarianhorntail.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:Hungarianhorntail.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 23:26, 11 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:RRLlogo.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:RRLlogo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 16:29, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Rugby storelist imgfront.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Rugby storelist imgfront.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:21, 24 October 2007 (UTC)