User talk:HrDansk

Ways to improve Iron chic
Hi, I'm Xyzspaniel. HrDansk, thanks for creating Iron chic!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Add some reference to reliable sources, such as coverage in national press, in order to establish that this band are notable

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. XyzSpaniel Talk Page  13:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Iron chic
Hello HrDansk,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Iron chic for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. XyzSpaniel Talk Page  13:57, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jon C. Teaford


The article Jon C. Teaford has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp/dated tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Boleyn (talk) 11:18, 12 April 2018 (UTC)

A page you started (Nordic Association for American Studies) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Nordic Association for American Studies, HrDansk!

Wikipedia editor Robertgombos just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"I added some references to Nordic Association for American Studies article. Please note that newly created articles which are unsourced are quite easily subject to Speedy Deletion. I also stubbed your article since is very short. If you expand it by using more sourced information, please feel free to unstub it. Cheers!"

To reply, leave a comment on Robertgombos's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Robertgombos (talk) 21:57, 20 May 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Nina Baym, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Radcliffe ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Nina_Baym check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Nina_Baym?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:14, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Reading protocol moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Reading protocol, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the prompts on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. ... disco spinster   talk  15:54, 8 October 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Quentin Skinner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Synchronic ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Quentin_Skinner check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Quentin_Skinner?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:50, 18 October 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Reading protocol concern
Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Reading protocol, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:38, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Reading protocol


Hello, HrDansk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Reading protocol".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the, , or  code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 13:21, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Change and continuity


The article Change and continuity has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Sources seem out-of-context, the article is a mess, jumping around multiple topics with no apparent logical line."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. EpicPupper 20:43, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Change and continuity for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Change and continuity is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Change and continuity until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. EpicPupper 04:50, 17 April 2021 (UTC)