User talk:Hrbardee/sandbox/draft

Peer Evaluation: I believe your response was very clear and concise. The second sentence has a grammar error, instead of "date bases" I think it should be "data bases". Your sources were reliable and you didn't form an opinion throughout the article which is good.

Hannah's Peer Review
This article presents good and reliable information about the subject of digital identity. The claims that were made all were clear and to the point and also all cited correctly in text and at the end of the addition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ktbannis (talk • contribs) 12:32, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Olivia Kincanon
Your topic was very clear and driven, and there is a lot of factual evidence supporting your topic. Very well written and it was very neutral based. I now have a clearer understanding of what digital identity is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olkincan (talk • contribs) 12:38, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Paul's Peer Review
This article is very good and all the information on the article is great, but it seems more like argument. The article start with hook which seems like essay form. Also, the ending of the article seems like argumentative structure. Eui135 (talk) 12:41, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

Hazel's Peer Review
Your article was very clear and straight forward, i enjoy all the supporting evidence that you incorporated into it. I do suggest that you condensed to not confuse the readers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hazelrod2 (talk • contribs) 04:22, 8 November 2018 (UTC)